My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/07/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/07/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:18:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br />• Public Works Director Lee stated that the funds would come from the Special Projects Fund. <br />Council Member Stigney asked how much money is actually in the Special Projects Fund. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that there is approximately $3.4 million in the Special Projects <br />Fund. <br />Mayor Marty stated that it has already been decided that insulation in the ceiling; new duct work; <br />roof work; outside wall/exterior work; the Police Department has to be changed around and re- <br />wired; bathrooms; public counters; and the basement are all areas that have been identified as <br />items within the base plan, that has to be done. He stated that when S.E.H. first came out they <br />had a beautiful, totally redesigned building for $3.5 million and the City cannot afford it or need <br />it. He stated that a resident suggested utilizing funds from the Cable Fund to pay for the roof air <br />conditioner and the re-wiring of the video room as a way to help pay for the overall project. He <br />agreed that line items should be included before it goes out for bid and should definitely be <br />included with the final packet. He stated that the plans and specifications should be more <br />specific and asked that Staff include the detail for their final review. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that as part of the report S.E.H. put together, they did go <br />through the building and identify window treatment and furniture but it was not included in the <br />bids. He explained that they were identified as needs but not included in the bids. He stated that <br />the Fund balance is $3,458,000.00 <br />Council Member Stigney referenced the $3,458,000 and asked what is allocated for expenditures <br />and scoped out for expenditure. that should be included and detailed. He asked what is in this <br />fund, dedicated to what item that would be considered necessary for this project. <br />Acting Finance Director Tatarek explained that at this point in time it is on the books as <br />undesignated. She explained that normally they do set aside designated and undesignated items. <br />She stated that if there were discussions, at a much higher level, as to what the future plans and <br />projects are; she is not privy to this information and cannot speak for it. She confirmed that this <br />is not a fund that gets added to on a regular basis so when it is touched they should be careful and <br />use the funds wisely. She stated that she would get back to the Council with any information <br />made available to her. <br />Council Member Stigney asked Director Ericson to clarify what uses the City has identified for. <br />the future where they could use this to lower the tax base.. He expressed concerns stating that the <br />City gets hit by the State every time the City has unreserved funds. <br />Director Ericson stated that Staff would pull the information together and provide to Council for <br />review. <br />• Council Member Thomas clarified that the Special Project Fund is actually money set aside for <br />the large projects the City is doing, it is not the Capital Improvement Fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.