My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/07/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/07/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:18:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />• that they needed to get certain things done to in order to get occupancy noting that he has. talked <br />with Director Ericson about this and asked if they could rent the building without the parking Iot <br />or does he have to wait until Velmeir decides to follow through with the plans they submitted to <br />him. He stated that he is asking the Council what to do. He stated that the City approved the <br />plans and a contractor came in from out of state and built on a piece of property they have owned <br />for over fifty years. He stated that he did discuss the project with Director Ericson and Economic <br />Development Coordinator Backman and told them that they were willing to sell the project <br />because they did not want to ruin the integrity of the building. He stated that they wanted to <br />share the right in and right out access noting that since that time they have lost the integrity of the <br />building, the parking lot is not done and the right in/right out access is not very convenient. He <br />expressed frustration stating that he does not know what to do and asked if the City would be <br />able to help him with Velmeir. <br />Director Ericson confirmed that there have been some difficulties dealing with the developer and <br />getting the project done. He stated that the property owner has been working with Velmeir in <br />getting the project done as to what was originally promised for the PAC building site. He stated <br />that they do have a letter executed by Velmeir indicating that they would honor and abide by <br />their original agreement to do improvements on the PAC building site and Staff feels confident <br />that they will follow through with it, recognizing that they have already been put out for several <br />months and are not sure when it would actually be completed. He stated that as to the question <br />of whether or not they can rent the building with the parking lot in the condition it is in, they can <br />rent the building noting that it is not in the condition that the either the City or he would prefer. <br />• Mr. Perrozzi ex lained that one of the reasons he does not want to rent the buildin the wa it is <br />p g y <br />right now is because of the problems he has had. He expressed concerns stating that he does not <br />want to misrepresent the issues with the new buyers from CVS adding that he is not sure if the <br />new buyers are- aware of all the ramifications and problems he has had with Velmeir. He stated <br />that he did meet with the new owner of the building noting that the new owner was livid. He <br />stated that it is obvious that the new owner was misrepresented by his employee noting that he <br />tried to talk to the owner about it and was basically told to hit the road and take care of it himself. <br />He explained that one of the reasons he does not want to be in charge of the planning for this <br />project is because the grades were screwed. up from the beginning. He stated that he does have <br />the capability of hiring the subcontractors to get the job done but if he does that he does not want <br />them to come back and accuse him of goofing it up. He stated that he wants Velmeir to put in <br />the parking lot and follow through on their commitment. He stated that the paperwork Staff <br />received from Velmeir includes one of the amendments to their purchase agreement but it does <br />not include the second amendment, which was the amendment for the curb removal. He <br />indicated that Kirstin signed off on the amendment for the curb removal noting that had he not <br />had that signed piece of paper at the time of closing, they would not have closed and wouldn't <br />have been dealing with Velmeir. He stated that he does not know what their stance is on this <br />issue adding that he is currently discussing this concern with his attorney and they are trying to <br />put together a plan. He stated that currently it has been left where he is supposed to be <br />.responsible for the parking lot and get it finished. He expressed concerns stating that he does not <br />. want the liability noting that the bond that Velmeir is holding does not cover the costs of the <br />scope of work left to be done. He asked if Council would visit the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.