My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page ZO <br />• two of her colleagues about the interest question and both indicated that they did not recall that <br />New Brighton included interest payments in their TIF Districts. <br />Dennis Hammes, 5511 Quincy, stated he spoke at the Town Hall meeting and while he is not <br />"for" or "against" Medtronic, he is having a hard time considering a 25-year TIF district. He <br />stated it does not seem right, is too high, and he does not think Medtronic really needs it. Mr. <br />Hammes stated when he collected signatures for the petition, he said this is something the <br />residents need to vote on, and did not make statements against Medtronic. He stated this should <br />be a decision for the residents of Mounds View and not five people because it is too much of a <br />burden for five people. He stated the entire community should be involved. <br />Connie Hammes, 5511 Quincy, pointed out that only Phase 1 is guaranteed in the draft purchase <br />agreement and contract. Phases 2 and 3 show tentative starting dates of 2012 and 2017. Full <br />development is optional and dependent upon future financial assistance for Phases 2 and 3. She <br />asked if both Phases 2 and 3 occur by additional future subsidies, what are the projections <br />concerning TIF as a percentage of the City's future tax capacity. <br />Director Ericson stated staff has not considered those numbers because there are too many <br />variables to even guess what will happen in 10 to 15 years. He stated at this point he does not <br />know what the property values will be or the impact to the City. <br />Ms. Hammes noted that Medtronic indicates no part of the purchase is for speculation or land <br />• holding. The draft contract is relevant only to Phase 1. There is no enforceable obligation <br />regarding sale or assignment for Phases 2 and 3. She asked if the Council has considered <br />subdividing Phase 1 construction, holding any balance of the Bridges property as a public asset, <br />contingent upon Medtronic's first right of refusal for future development phases. <br />Councilmember Thomas explained that Phases 2 and 3, as far as projected development, is going <br />up, not out, so it would have the same footprint. Because of that, there is no way to subdivide <br />out properties for future phases. <br />Mayor Marty stated it was his understanding that Medtronic wanted the whole deal. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated it is diff cult to deal with "what ifs" down the road. This <br />development contract deals with Phase 1 construction of approximately an 8,200 square foot <br />footprint of development. The contract defines the development property and the EDA has to <br />consent to any assignments or sales so the City does have that control right now. <br />Joan Dofney, 7801 Gloria Circle, stated this is the second year that City Administrator Ulrich has <br />worked in Mounds View. She asked City staff if they live in Mounds View. All staff members <br />present indicated they do not. <br />Ms. Dofney asked if any of the Medtronic representatives in attendance live in Mounds View. <br />• She stated the Council has been voted in to represent her and those who signed the petition. She <br />stated all would agree this is a large multi-million dollar deal with a health provider for people <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.