My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• provide their own needs. She stated it is important for Mounds View to get the best deal <br />possible for this very prime property that is close to two major freeways, and an airport. She <br />stated this property should be of great value to residents of Mounds View and the developer. Ms. <br />Walsh pointed out that citizens are also giving up access to an amenity of a golf course. She <br />stated she has questions about the terms of the contract and stated her understanding that State <br />statutes stipulate TIF Districts should only go for a term of 8 years but Medtronic is receiving a <br />25-year TIF term. <br />Mayor Marty explained there are different types of TIF Districts. One is for redevelopment for <br />blighted property or buildings created before 1990. Another is for contaminated soils. He noted <br />there are no buildings at the golf course constructed before 1990 and the soil testing was okay. <br />Because of that, the Legislature indicated the only type of TIF District to qualify would be an <br />economic development district that is capped at 8 years. It was then lobbied for and extended by <br />the Legislature to run an additional 17 years. <br />Ms. Walsh asked if this legislation occurred during the extended session. Commissioner Thomas <br />answered it occurred during the regular session. <br />Ms. Walsh asked when residents will hear whether the referendum will take place. Mayor Many <br />answered that it is an agenda item for tonight. <br />Ms. Walsh asked about the indemnification and if there is a way to know how much it may cost <br />• Mounds View residents. City Attorney Riggs explained the liability is capped for what is being <br />transferred to Medtronic fora $200,000 fee. <br />Ms. Walsh asked what that means. Councilmember Thomas explained that if something occurs, <br />liability is capped at $200,000 as the EDA. She noted that environmental studies have been done <br />and it is not believed that anything will come up. <br />City Administrator Ulrich further explained that should environmental contamination show up, <br />the City's liability would be capped at $200,000. Environmental liability that carries with the <br />property is a separate item and if there should be an environmental issue that causes liability then <br />the City, because of the nature of environmental law and chain of title, could be brought back in. <br />He stated there is no way to predict and he cannot estimate a dollar. <br />Ms. Walsh asked if catastrophic environmental insurance is available. City Administrator Ulrich <br />stated there may be if you are willing to pay the premium but he does not know what it would <br />cost. <br />Mary Burg, New Brighton Councilmember, stated they had negotiations with Medtronic until <br />mid-June when they learned New Brighton was not a site being considered. She stated the New <br />Brighton Council looked at catastrophic insurance and found a 10-year policy to cover the <br />$250,000 cap that is set by the State. The policy was for $700,000 and would go for 10 years. <br />Ms. Burg stated they were concerned at that time because while contamination was not on their <br />site, people would possible sue because of "deep pockets." She mentioned that she had called <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.