My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 45 <br />i Councilmember Stigney noted that getting $5 million cash could add $250,000 a year for the next <br />20 years to offset the tax base. At that point the Medtronic's project will be over and then it will <br />bring in $1 million a year. He stated as much as he respects the attempt to oppose, he thinks they <br />are all on the "wrong page" and no one has convinced him to the contrary. He stated he asks <br />what could be better but no one has an answer to that so he is a Councilmember who is proud to <br />vote for it. <br />Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Marty) Motion carried. <br />Councilmember Gunn read into the record the e-mail statement submitted by John Murphy, <br />resident of Mounds View. <br />(1) Resolution 6581 City of Mounds View Resolution Authorizing Sale of <br />City of Mounds View Property to the Mounds View Economic <br />Development Authority <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated the City Attorney recommends that action be <br />taken on this item. <br />Mr. McCarty stated when we first began discussion about getting a better exchange of ideas, they <br />went on the long-standing precedent that they were honored by the Council and sought out <br />• guidance from staff to assure the petition was in the correct form. He noted. Ordinance 760 <br />references the validity of Chapter 12.05 of the City Charter and was adopted and put in place <br />accordingly. He stated there are many reasons and precedents we could consider. Mr. McCarty <br />asked those who do not want this to go to the voters; what strikes fear in their heart to have <br />residents vote on this issue. He asked if we are so full of ourselves that we don't want them to <br />vote. He again asked what is the fear to let residents vote <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated it does not "strike fear in him" and he has said all along he has <br />no problem with the petition if that is what the people want to do, they should be able to do that. <br />He noted the Council just voted on the sufficiency because there were not enough signatures and <br />the question is invalid. He stated he asked the City Attorney if there was recourse and the answer <br />was yes, there is recourse. He stated he is not afraid of the resident's vote. <br />Mr. McCarty stated there is no recourse other than going to court. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated they have the ability to challenge, go to court, or come up with a <br />different opinion. He stated there are other ways to approach this and he is sure they have <br />explored those options. <br />Mr. McCarty stated the only recourse is to go to court and it is unseemly to him that they would <br />have to go to court and fight their own money with their own money. He stated the Council can <br />. embrace the democratic process by an advisory election and not endanger the City's position. He <br />stated that to just throw out a document that has been rallied around for years is just not right and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.