Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 46 <br />• in his opinion the Council's action just "gutted the Charter." <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated the City has adopted ordinances from time <br />to time when certain property has been conveyed from the City to the EDA. The City Attorney's <br />August 11, 2005 letter indicates that State iaw allows the City to convey property without regard <br />to City Charter provisions. Minnesota State Statute 471.64 authorizes the City to enter into a <br />contract for the sale of real properly to another political subdivision without regard to Charter <br />provisions. Although the City Council complied with the Charter and adopted an ordinance <br />authorizing the conveyance, the Statute provides authority for the Council to adopt a resolution <br />authorizing staff to finalize conveyance of the properly to the EDA. Staff recommends the <br />Council adopt the draft resolution which would convey the property known as the Bridges Golf <br />Course to the Mounds View EDA. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6581 <br />Authorizing Sale of City of Mounds View Property to the Mounds View Economic Development <br />Authority <br />Mayor Marty stated his belief that taking this action is a blatant way to circumvent the Charter <br />since the sale of land is to be done by ordinance. However, to pass a resolution conveying this <br />property seems like over-kill or like someone is worried about this stopping and wanting to make <br />sure residents don't have the opportunity to vote. <br />• Councilmember Gunn stated the EDA has handled all the land buying and selling and it has not <br />been done through the Council. She stated this is no different. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she was firmly against doing this by resolution because it needed <br />to be done by ordinance. Now the Council has done it by ordinance so it is not circumventing <br />anything. She stated this vote is the hardest thing she has ever had to do in her life. She stated <br />she was very firm in conversations with staff that until that stand was made, this was off the <br />table. Now this is a matter of paperwork, involves no change, or change in the process. She <br />noted there have been discussions and the public has been dealt with in a way that was <br />honorable. Councilmember Thomas reiterated that this is just paperwork. <br />Mayor Marty stated he begs to differ with the opinion that this is just paperwork. He noted it was <br />petitioned and deemed invalid but why duplicate the process with a resolution just to ensure that <br />all the bases are covered. He stated that seems to him to be over kill. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it probably is and she does not know that it will serve any more <br />benefit than action already taken but it is staff's recommendation so she will support it. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with Councilmember Thomas and does not want to <br />leave any loopholes open that may delay this development. <br />• Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Marty) Motion carried. <br />