Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 47 <br />• Ms. Hawke stated that a Councilmember remarked earlier it was known that an ordinance wasn't <br />the right thing. She asked why it was even allowed and for them to follow it through with what <br />they thought was the City Charter. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that she knew this might be a problem because she was familiar <br />with this issue, with some of the administrative questions, so she knew this issue was going to <br />come up. However, she did not know what the Council was going to decide, what the City <br />Attorney was going to come down to, or what the final decision will come down to. <br />Ms. Hawke asked City Attorney Riggs why he did not advise the Council earlier about this issue. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated he did so on July 11. <br />Ms. Hawke asked why he didn't then inform all the citizens so they didn't go to all the effort. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated it was a preliminary opinion and was moot depending on the petition. <br />He stated that when the petition came out he said immediately that the question was an issue. In <br />addition relative to the PUD, he also cited a case and suggested they check that case. However, <br />Ms. Hawke referred to a different case that existed before the Legislature adopted the Municipal <br />Land Planning Act and Chapter 462. <br />Ms. Hawke stated she believes there was a disservice made to the citizens because something was <br />not definitely said. She said she really appreciates the petition circulators and the Council should <br />too. She stated it is everyone's first amendment right to vote on something and she is sorry the <br />• Council did not let them carry through with it. She stated the PUD is to be a zoning code <br />ordinance so it will come around to be another ordinance. <br />Ms. Hawke stated she will not spend money on court cases but will spend shoe leather. She <br />stated she wants to be sure we do have the right to vote and believes the City could get a better <br />price on the land and that the TIF District didn't have to be 25 years. However, that's opinion <br />and she appreciates where the Council is coming from. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated the TIF district with Medtronic is for 25 years and that seems to <br />be a big problem. However, every TIF District in Mounds View is a 25 year TIF district. <br />O. Resolution 6609 Approving the Hire of Heidi Heller to the Position of <br />Planning Associate in the Community Development Department <br />Community Development Director Ericson reviewed that on June 13, 2005, the City Council <br />authorized staff to advertise for the vacant planning associate position in the Community <br />Development Department. Staff received almost 50 applications, interviewed five candidates, <br />and made an offer of employment to Heidi Heller contingent upon Council approval and <br />satisfactory background checks. Ms. Heller would start at Step 1, which is $36,982 and begin <br />employment on August 29, 2005, pending satisfactory background check. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6609 <br />Approving the Hire of Heidi Heller to the Position of Planning Associate in the Community <br />