My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/09/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/09/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:20:30 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:20:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/26/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br />• time, he was putting twin homes along County Road H2 and that was more amenable than any <br />other plan. Mr. Harstad wanted to tie it to Long View Estates on Silver Lake Road but the <br />Council felt it was two separate projects so they were dealt with separately. <br />Mayor Marty stated he would be amenable to discussing this and thinks the residents in this area <br />would also. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it is talking about 33 units along Greenwood Drive. .She noted <br />the City will not be able to purchase per acre because Mr. Harstad would want it purchased by <br />unit. Mayor Marty stated there are actually 34 units. <br />Mayor Marty referenced the staff report indicating: "... if the City felt the interior lots (taking <br />access from Louisa and Clearview) would be better suited for open space, wetlands preservation <br />or stormwater management, perhaps grants could be obtained to assist in that preservation." He <br />asked what are the possibilities for grants for wetland preservation. <br />Director Ericson stated that from time to time grant programs are available for green corridors <br />that connect and staff can explore all opportunities for funding. However, it is not realistic to <br />think that one hundred percent of the acquisition could be covered by a grant. <br />Mayor Marty stated when the theater was constructed, it was counted as an overflow to handle <br />the drainage from the theater. He stated it seems to him that the wetland was taken into <br />• consideration as far as the 100-year storm excess run off. Director Ericson stated it is not his <br />recollection that the property was considered as overflow but the water does flow in that <br />direction from the theater. He noted the historical direction of water flow did not change with <br />the construction of the theater site and the amount of flow did not increase. <br />Mayor Marty asked if there is Council consensus to discuss this matter in closed cession. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated Mr. Harstad won his law suit and should be able to develop as <br />awarded. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he thinks the Council should look at it and determine whether it <br />would be fiscally prudent to even consider. He stated that he is willing to talk about it in closed <br />session, make an offer, and see what the City gets. <br />Mayor Marty asked if that would have to be discussed in closed session. Director Ericson <br />answered in the affirmative. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the City is not yet at a point to make a specific offer and maybe <br />the Council direction would be to direct Staff to start working with other developers to try and <br />bridge the gap between the cost to Mr. Harstad and end development sale. He stated it may be <br />possible to talk .with developers to see if there is even potential for a different type of <br />• development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.