Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />• Director Ericson noted the site plan that shows the existing SYSCO building and to the east the <br />three acre sliver of land that would be taken from Outlot A and added to the developed parcel of <br />SYSCO, as SYSCO Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. He explained that with the subdivision of <br />land, Staff looked at park dedication fees. Given that SYSCO deeded the 46 acres of land to the <br />City and paid a park dedication fee in 1989, it had been previous Council consensus to not <br />require another park dedication fee. <br />Director Ericson reviewed again the easement to be vacated and action requested by the Council <br />which includes land disposition from Mounds View back to SYSCO. The City Charter requires <br />that to be done by ordinance. <br />Director Ericson explained that Agenda Item 8.A.5. relates to Metropolitan Council and their <br />review of the Comprehensive Plan amendment which the Planning Commission recommended <br />and Council adopted. The Metropolitan Council felt it was somewhat inconsistent because the <br />AUAR did not anticipate any impact to the wetlands. The Metropolitan Council is requiring that <br />the City authorize an amendment to the Bridges Office Development AUAR to reflect the fact <br />that there will be impacts to wetlands on the SYSCO Outlot A parcel. The Planning <br />Commission adopted a resolution that addressed the fact that the AUAR would need to be <br />amended to show there would be a one-half acre of wetland impact on the SYSCO property. The <br />mitigation would be accomplished consistent with the standards of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />• Director Ericson noted this project has been heard at several previous meetings and the Planning <br />Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of all actions being considered by the <br />Council. He summarized the resolutions and ordinances before the Council at the meeting this <br />evening and offered to answer questions. He also noted that representatives of SYSCO are in the <br />audience. <br />Mayor Marty asked the audience if anyone wished to address this issue. <br />Hearing none, Mayor Marty closed the Public Hearings at 7:36 p.m. <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked about the cost to amend the AUAR and if SYSCO will cover <br />those costs. Director Ericson stated there is probably a cost and SYSCO would be responsible <br />for that cost. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated the City is grateful that SYSCO dedicated the land to the City. <br />However, in the future, he would like it stricken so that issue does not keep coming up before the <br />City. He explained that by doing so it makes the Council feel obligated to deed it back. He <br />stated in future negotiations he does not want the dedication issue raised again. <br />Mayor Marty stated that while he understands the issue, it was SYSCO's land. <br />• Councilmember Flaherty stated he understands that but SYSCO deeded the land to the City. <br />