Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />• to execute a cross access, joint parking and maintenance agreement with the owner of the <br />Walgreens site and provide a copy to the City. <br />He stated there is but one access to the site which is the shared driveway onto Edgewood Drive. <br />While it is possible for clients of the building to exit County Road 10 and access the Belting <br />building indirectly via the Walgreens site, this would be a more circuitous route and would not be <br />encouraged. <br />He indicated the Walgreens PUD requires that the building shall be constructed of high-quality <br />masonry construction using brick and brick accents to match the Community Center, theater and <br />City Hall. Materials and siding effects shall be consistently applied on all four building <br />elevations. The PUD document does not however explicitly indicate the percentage of the <br />building which needs to be brick or masonry. The Applicant desires to incorporate a mix of <br />exterior finish materials to help accent the building. It should be noted that the Walgreens <br />building is at best 60% brick, the remaining upper 40% being stucco (EIFS). He noted it was not <br />necessary to have full brick on the back side, but staff felt it was important to have a continuing <br />facade on the north, west and south side of the building. <br />He stated according to Section 15 of the Walgreens PUD document, the Belting parcel is <br />permitted a maximum 100 square feet of ground monument signage (excluding the .sign base) <br />plus an additional 100 square feet of building mounted signage per building occupant. Staff will <br />• review all signage permits to ensure consistency with both the PUD as well as Chapter 1008 of <br />the Municipal Code relating to signage. <br />He indicated the photometric analysis provided for the project has two options, both of which <br />satisfy the City's minimum requirements concerning glare and light spillage. The second option <br />(option 2) allows slightly more light to spill over the periphery of the Community Center parking <br />lot, which may be a desirable outcome. <br />He stated an easement originally platted with the Mounds View City Hall addition will need to <br />be vacated as a result of this plan. The easement had been taken assuming a different utilization. <br />A new easement would be taken in its place. The applicant's engineer has prepared the legal <br />descriptions for the easement to be vacated along with the description of the easement to be <br />acquired. <br />He noted the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the development review request at <br />their meeting on September 21, 2005, recommending approval. <br />He stated staffl s recommendation was to approve Resolution 817-OS which recommends <br />approval of a development review for the proposed 8,300 square foot single story office building <br />at 2395 County Road 10. <br />Dr. Greg Belting, 1525 Sherman Lake Road, Lino Lakes, stated they had missed the all brick <br />• requirement for the building materials when they designed the building. He indicated their <br />destination point was a business usage purpose and he stated they could have a nice look to the <br />