My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />• building without having a total brick building. He stated he wanted to put up a nice building and <br />intended on being in the City a long time. He indicated people would own these office <br />condominiums. <br />Tom Belting, 1222 Blackwood Street, Coon Rapids, stated they had looked at the front of the <br />building as a focal point. He indicated they were willing to add additional landscaping. He <br />presented an alternative plan for the exterior of the building. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated with this building being in the City Center, there were some <br />aesthetic requirements that needed to be met and as long as the building looked nice and <br />aesthetically pleasing, she did not believe they needed a certain percentage of brick material. She <br />asked what percentage of brick material were they intending on putting on the building. Tom <br />Belting responded the alternative they came up with was a good option and presented at tonight's <br />meeting. <br />Dr. Belting stated he did not know the percentage of brick they were proposing at this time. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated this was a PUD and the reason this was a PUD for Walgreen and <br />the Community Center was to blend into the City Hall, which were all brick. He indicated the <br />Walgreens PUD required masonry. He noted the Planning Commissioners had stated they <br />wanted it brick on all sides. Dr. Belting indicated the Planning Commissioners had noted they <br />could not make that decision and it would have to be Council's decision. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he believed this building should be all brick. He asked what other <br />..materials where they contemplating. Tom Belting replied they were intending on putting up <br />aluminum siding. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he did not want aluminum siding. <br />Councilmember Flaherty noted he had no problem for the owner making this building inviting. <br />He stated he had a personal preference to the North Oaks building they showed pictures of and he <br />did not have a problem amending the PUD. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated a lot of this had to deal with the color scheme also and she agreed <br />the North Oaks picture was very nice. She indicated she understood why they were requiring the <br />all masonry, but believed they limited themselves when there were other very attractive <br />alternatives also. She stated she did not have any problems with this request. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated an aesthetic look involved more than just the building materials <br />and indicated she did not have an issue with their request as long as the building matched the <br />existing buildings in the area. <br />Mayor Marty stated he liked the North Oaks picture and Vadnais Heights pictures. He indicated <br />. because this was the City Center, he would not have a problem with having a building such as <br />depicted by these pictures. He noted they did not want every single building in the City Center <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.