My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/12/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/12/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:22:09 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:22:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />1 Councilmember Thomas stated she does not think rezoning is the proper solution and encouraged <br />• 2 staff to see if an adaptation to the Code is an option. She suggested the Council discuss this <br />3 matter at a Work Session to see what can be done. Councilmember Thomas noted Ms. Colleen <br />4 was being "above board" in notifying the City that she was going to be accepting rent for this <br />5 space. Councilmember Thomas stated she does not think rezoning is the answer because it <br />6 expands authorization well beyond where the applicant wants to be. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Gunn asked what happens if the rezoning is denied. Director Ericson stated in <br />9 the correspondence with Ms. Colleen, she was provided with two options: 1) rezoning; or, 2) to <br />1 o remove the kitchen facility. Director Ericson stated there is a gray area in the difference between <br />11 a "bar" and a "kitchen." He stated the City would indicate the kitchen facility needs to be <br />12 removed; .the full sized refrigerator, stove, and sinks. He stated that the property owner was <br />13 presented with those two options. <br />14 <br />15 Mayor Marty stated he can see both sides of this issue and after hearing the applicant's story <br />16 about how this evolved, can picture how that could have happened. However, with a rezoning it <br />17 is as Councilmember Stigney said, once it is rezoned to R-2 it will be constituted rental property. <br />18 At the present time, he concurs with Councilmember Stigney to approve the resolution to deny <br />19 the rezoning and then the Council can have more discussion on this issue. He noted if the stove <br />20 is removed then there could be a shared kitchen area and it would be more like renting out a <br />21 room. <br />22 <br />• 23 Ms. Colleen stated her other option was to remove the cupboards, the stove, and the sink. She <br />24 stated her willingness to remove the stove but explained that the sink was installed and inspected <br />25 for the wet bar. She stated she did not think there was a problem with installing cupboards in <br />26 this location since other houses have cupboards in many locations, such as the garage or <br />27 bedroom. She explained that she refinanced her home three times and sold her river place to <br />28 build this addition. <br />29 <br />3o Mayor Marty stated his house has a downstairs bar with cupboards and a refrigerator. He stated <br />31 he supports .the resolution for denial and asked. the applicant to work with staff to make a few <br />32 minor adjustments, such as taking out the stove to keep the property in compliance. He noted the <br />33 renter could still use the space, share the main kitchen, and still do the yard work for Ms. <br />34 Colleen. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Thomas asked if it is enough to take out the stove. Director Ericson stated there <br />37 is enough of a change so it is additional living space. However, if the stove and refrigerator are <br />38 removed, the appearance of the kitchen would be removed and it would better satisfy the Code. <br />39 He stated staff can work with Ms. Colleen to make modifications short of removing the sink. <br />40 However, if this space is advertised for rent to anon-family member, then staff would have <br />41 .objection. He explained the concern to not have other properties start renting out to non-family <br />42 members or many college students. <br />43 <br />44 Director Ericson stated that staff will. continue to work with Ms. Colleen to satisfy her needs if <br />.45 the Council moves forward with the denial of the rezoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.