My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 12:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />1 <br />2 8B. Resolution 6779 Approving the Purchase of a Replacement Mower for the <br />3 Parks Division. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Stigney asked why the old mower was not put in the golf course auction. He <br />6 stated he spoke with City Administrator Ulrich who indicated the mower would be put up for <br />7 auction, but the resolution shows it as a trade-in. <br />8 <br />9 Director of Public Works Lee stated when it comes to disposal of equipment, it can be put up for <br />10 auction, but 10 percent is lost to the auctioneer. <br />11 <br />12 Councilmember Stigney stated there was a big auction at the golf course with a lot of equipment. <br />13 <br />14 Director of Public Works Lee stated this equipment was always scheduled to be traded in, and it <br />15 could not be disposed of before approval was received to replace it. <br />16 <br />17 City Administrator Ulrich pointed out there is the option of putting the equipment in the <br />18 government surplus auction in Arden Hills. <br />19 <br />20 Councilmember Stigney stated the budget was for this year, and it could have came before the <br />21 Council to indicate if the equipment was put up for bid, this is what is projected to pay. He <br />22 questioned if the figures could have been found out well ahead of time. He wondered if the City <br />23 could have made more money if it was sold at the golf course auction with a reserve on it. <br />24 <br />25 Councilmember Stigney wondered if putting the equipment up for auction will be beneficial in <br />26 time and money. <br />27 <br />28 Director of Public Works Lee stated it can be done either way, but it could not be sold in the golf <br />29 course auction because the replacement was not approved in October. He suggested it could be <br />30 added to the state auction, but pointed out that 10 percent would be lost off the top for the <br />31 auction fee. <br />32 <br />33 Councilmember Stigney asked if other people that sell this item have been contacted to see what <br />34 could be received on trade. <br />35 <br />36 Director of Public Works Lee explained that the State has done that as part of the State bidding <br />37 process. He explained it is open to anyone who wanted to bid on the item. He stated this is the <br />38 lowest bid of the item. <br />39 <br />40 Councilmember Stigney asked if anyone has been contacted that has sold this device and what <br />41 the possible trade-in value is, exclusive of the State bidding process. <br />42 <br />43 Councilmember Thomas stated the point of using the State bid process is so Staff does not waste <br />44 time in doing something the State already did. She pointed out the State performs the bid process <br />45 in larger quantities and provides greater access to those who do the appropriate bidding. She <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.