My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 12:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />change. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated there is no point in negating the area entirely, as long as it is <br />controlled by height. She stated she could accept the Staff recommendation to remove it from <br />the north side where there are no residences. She stated she is more interested in protecting the <br />residents' homes. <br />Mayor Marty stressed he wanted to keep billboards out of the main thoroughfare. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated there are a lot of signs on the end of County Road 10, and she <br />would much rather have signs there than anywhere else on the road. <br />Mayor Marty stated there is the guarantee from Medtronic that they will buy out two signs, so the <br />City does not have to put them there just because the City could. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated there is no guarantee that Clear Channel will find spots where the <br />Council is allocating signs. <br />Councilmember Thomas pointed out that the Sign Code does not apply to just that situation. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agreed with not putting billboards on County Road 10 at all. <br />City Administrator Ulrich commented out that the City has the obligation to provide some areas <br />where signs can be located. He stated by indicating that signs can be located on I-35W and Old <br />County Road 8, the City has met the contractual obligations to provide areas where signs could <br />be explored with the property owners with locations with Clear Channel and it opens up to other <br />companies as well. He stated the City does not have to necessarily go beyond that. <br />Ayes — 3 Nays — 1 (Thomas) Amendment motion carried. <br />Councilmember Thomas suggested an amendment to keep the maximum height at 35 feet unless <br />it is outside of the 250 foot radius of residences. She stated the 45 feet limit will hit close to <br />some of the places on Old Highway 8. Director Ericson explained the signs have to be located <br />beyond 250 feet from the residences, regardless of height. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if the height limitation would be allowed at 45 feet around the <br />area. <br />Councilmember Gunn asked if the changes would be a height restriction of 35 feet along County <br />Highway 10 and 45 feet along I-35W, Old Highway 8, and Highway 10. Director Ericson stated <br />that was the initial recommendation for change. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she does not want it to be 45 feet if it will be close to residences, <br />which there is on Old Highway 8. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.