My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 12:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />1 Councilmember Gunn wondered if the signs would want to be higher rather than lower. <br />2 Councilmember Thomas responded no because the higher it gets, it causes light pollution and is <br />3 disrespectful to residents. <br />4 <br />5 AMENDMENT MOTION: THOMAS/MARTY. To amend Chapter 1008 of the Municipal <br />6 Code Relating to Signs and Billboards, to allow a maximum billboard height of 35 feet on Old <br />7 Highway 8. <br />8 <br />9 Director Ericson stated he would take the Ordinance back and check the map to see how much it <br />10 would impact the sites if it was changed to reflect a 500 foot setback for residential zoned <br />11 property. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Thomas stated it would be only for the 45 foot height limitation. <br />14 <br />15 Mayor Marty stated depending on where the location of the sign is, a variance could be <br />16 requested. <br />17 <br />18 Councilmember Stigney stated that one of the problems is the relocation of billboards and where <br />19 to put them, and that a certain height is required for the billboards to be visible in some locations. <br />20 He stated this issue was already discussed, and the certain locations that require a height of 45 <br />21 feet have been designated. He stated he does not support the amendment. <br />22 <br />23 Councilmember Thomas stated Old Highway 8 was not part of that discussion. <br />24 <br />25 Mayor Marty stated there are residents living in that area, and the height requirement could be 35 <br />26 feet, and a variance could be requested for signs on Old Highway 8. He stated the City would <br />27 look at it if it is a hardship and if it does not infringe on the citizens, it would not be a big deal. <br />28 He stated for the protection of the residents, he supports an amendment of the height requirement <br />29 of 35 feet on Old Highway 8. <br />30 <br />31 Councilmember Gunn asked Rick Sonterre, representative for Clear Channel Outdoors, if they <br />32 were putting billboards along Old Highway 8, would they be put on the I-35W side by I-35W or <br />33 on the business side. She asked who would see the billboards if they were on the business side. <br />34 <br />35 Mr. Sonterre, stated that all of the property between Old Highway 8 and the MnDOT fence line is <br />36 public held land and does not allow for construction. <br />37 <br />38 Councilmember Stigney asked Mr. Sonterre if there would be a problem with having a height <br />39 requirement of Councilmember Stigney asked Mr.Sonterre if he would have a problem with a 35 <br />40 foot height requirement and coming in for variance for any heights above that. <br />41 <br />42 Mr. Sonterre stated that Clear Channel prefers to have a single common voice with Tom <br />43 McCarver on all policy matters and negotiations with the City. He stated he prefers to have Mr. <br />44 McCarver speak on this question. He stated if an evaluation was done of the locations that exist <br />45 and look at the obstacles that would be a hindrance to visibility rights, it would be assumed that a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.