Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 23, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />'• Establishing the Components of the Private Improvement Program in Conjunction with the Street <br />and Utility Improvement Program. <br />Council Member Mueller put residents on notice that this project will start in the spring so they <br />have time now to call contractors and get information. She asked whether the agreement would <br />have a "safety net" and implied consent if a signature were not submitted to the City by a certain <br />date. Mr. Rhein explained that the agreements will be handled administratively and needs to be <br />signed and in place 24 hours prior to the start of construction. If a signed agreement is not in <br />place, the work on private property would not occur. He explained that Staff would like to solicit <br />interested residents to use this process to assure the new street and curb project do not need to be <br />disturbed to complete improvements on private property. <br />The Council discussed the option of requiring a $500 deposit if the improvement cost is assessed <br />for 5 or 10 years. Finance Director Beer noted the City did not want to discourage anyone from <br />using this option. Mr. Rhein stated the most common improvement is to widen the access and he <br />does not think there will be so many sanitary sewer improvements that it affects the cash flow of <br />this project. <br />In response to Council Member Stigney's questions, Mr. Rhein stated there would be no cost to <br />residents to match the existing driveway width and transition the driveway to the property line. If <br />the property owner wants the new bituminous driveway all the way to the garage, they would <br />have to enter into a private agreement with a contractor. <br />Council Member Stigney suggested the process be looked at after the first part of the project is <br />completed. Finance Director Beer stated the Council could modify the program at any time <br />during the project. <br />Mayor Flaherty suggested a threshold be established that if a certain percentage of properties take <br />advantage of this option, raising a concern with cash flow, it would be cut off. Mr. Rhein <br />suggested the threshold be established using a dollar amount rather than a percentage. Finance <br />Director Beer recommended the maximum of $100,000. <br />Council Member Stigney noted that private property improvements outside the project area are <br />not addressed in the resolution. Mr. Rhein stated if an improvement comes up during the project, <br />they would return with a revised resolution. He explained that anyone can talk with the City's <br />contractor and pay them privately to do their driveway but that would be outside of the City's <br />contract. The City can provide interested residents with the rate being paid for this project. <br />Council Member Mueller asked if residents would need to obtain a City permit for driveway <br />improvements on private property. Mr. Rhein stated they would if the improvement is outside <br />this contract. <br />• Finance Director Beer clarified that private improvements from the right-of--way to the garage <br />will not be assessed and have to be paid by the property owner. <br />