Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 23, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 28 <br />• that staff works hard to satisfy the City's goals and implement the vision of the Council. <br />Director Ericson stated that staff is excited that there is a great year ahead, and it was beneficial <br />to look back to 2005 to see what has been accomplished and how far the City has come. <br />Director Ericson stated that one of the biggest things done in the department is to look at, review, <br />and address building permits. He reported the department looks at building plans and works out <br />in the field inspecting building permits. He stated that the budgeted expectation was not met in <br />either 2004 or 2005. He explained that in 2003, the permit value of the building activity was <br />$12.3 million. In 2004, it decreased to $9.4 million. In 2005, Director Ericson stated that the <br />City planned for a decrease as there is not always that big project. Director Ericson reported that <br />in 2005, the permit value of the building activity was $7.9 million. He stated staff had somewhat <br />anticipated there would be a huge project in 2005; however, the permits for Medtronic will come <br />in 2006, and because of this, staff anticipates a banner year for permit revenue in 2006. In fact, it <br />is expected to be higher than any year before. He stated there was a shortfall for permit revenue <br />in 2005. <br />Director Ericson reported that the Department looks at every expenditure and determines if it is <br />something critical. He stated a firm look was taken on expenditures, and this will be addressed <br />later in his report. <br />Director Ericson stated that at the end of 2005, revenue was down approximately $12,000 for the <br />• department, which included not only building permit fees, but other permit fees such as plan <br />check fees, zoning permits, mechanical permits, plumbing, contractors' licenses, housing <br />inspections, apartment Licenses and all the planning activity that goes along with that. He <br />reported that 100% of the shortfall can be attributed to the building permit valuation decrease. <br />He stated this does not mean the department was less busy and pointed out there was a 10% <br />increase in number of permits. He explained the value associated with the permits was just not <br />as high. Director Ericson reported that in 2006, the department will be supremely busy along <br />with bringing in the revenues to support it. <br />Director Ericson explained that regarding expenditures, the City's Community Development <br />Department does not have a large budget, and that any expenditure that goes unspent or a <br />vacancy in the Department makes a large impact. He reported that the Department came in under <br />budget on expenditures, so the revenue shortfall was covered. <br />Director Ericson stated that the financials for 2005 have not been finalized. He explained that <br />the personnel total did not include the last payroll in the year, so rather than being $33,000 under, <br />it actually was $22,000 under budget. He explained this was due to the Planning Associate <br />vacancy for three months in addition to other minor things. Director Erickson stated that total <br />expenditures were $34,000 under budget from what was anticipated. He stressed that all <br />departments work hard to not spend unnecessarily and do not look at bottom line on December <br />15 to see what can be spent for the rest of year. <br />• Director Ericson reviewed the activity of the Planning Commission, and stated there were 36 <br />planning applications, which is slightly more than typical. He added the Commission also <br />