My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br />• <br />l~ <br />~J <br />Director of Public Works Lee stated if the project is going to happen in 2006, the Council needs <br />to keep moving on this. He explained there would be the same issues on the west side <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the cost estimates for the west side of the street does not figure in <br />the additional wetland construction costs. <br />Director of Public Works Lee stated that there are wetlands on both sides of the road north of <br />County Road H2. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if there would be a similar cost increase on the west side with a <br />similar boardwalk. Director of Public Works Lee stated that is correct. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked to see the costs for the west side to review the feasibility and <br />practicality. He stated it is premature to try to resolve this tonight. <br />Mayor Marty commented that this project was promised to the citizens of Mounds View in 1994, <br />and it is time to get the project done. He recommended that Option B be selected to get the <br />project going. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that regardless of cost, going ahead to get something done is not <br />the right thing to do at this time. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that cost is not the only factor, but there are other factors still in <br />place that lead her to choose the east side. She stated she does not like spending that much <br />money, but the Council should not delay the decision, as construction costs will only increase. <br />She recommended the project move forward with Option B. <br />MOTION/SECOND: GLTNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and amend Resolution 6756 to <br />Authorize Plans and Specifications for a Sidewalk on the east side of Silver Lake Road between <br />County Road H and County Road I for the Silver Lake Road Sidewalk Improvement Project by <br />proceeding with Option B. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated TIF will be discussed at the worksession on Wednesday, and that <br />without determining the costs on the west side, the Council is rushing things too much. He stated <br />there is no reason that the decision could not be delayed for a week or two to get final estimates <br />and to make a comparison back and forth. He stated total TIF expenditures that will be spent <br />throughout the City could all be reviewed at once. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated information supporting the sidewalk on the east side was received <br />from the neighborhood meeting. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the preference was fairly significant for the sidewalk on the east <br />side. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.