My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:38:10 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:38:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />• and there would need to be full-time employee benefits paid. He stated the additional <br />communication duties could have been assigned to an existing full-time Staff member. He stated <br />he does not support hiring an additional person. <br />City Administrator Ulrich read the resolution. <br />Mayor Marty stated the three-fourths time cable coordinator position did the cable part pretty <br />well, but the website was severely lacking. He explained that Director Ericson. updated the <br />website in his limited spare time. He indicated that this person would also do any necessary <br />press releases out of the City. He indicated the position includes several additional job duties <br />and responsibilities. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that the additional duties should be handled by existing full-time <br />Staff. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />D. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 772, an Ordinance Amending <br />Chapter 7 of the City Charter Relating to Taxation and Finances. <br />Jonathan Thomas, Mounds View Charter Chairperson, stated it was recommended that Chapter <br />7.04, Subdivision 1, be changed so that the sentences regarding the "proposed operating budget" <br />and the "final budget" are reversed. He indicated this was discussed in the Work Session, but <br />was not changed on the Ordinance. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that in Section 7.05, he stated he has concerns with using the <br />word "element" to describe the Five-Year Financial Plan. He stated "element" is inappropriate to <br />redefine the names of the segments that are in the Five-Year Financial Plan. He stated they <br />should be called "Program" or "Summary", as they have always been called. He stated the word <br />does not have to be tied into all the titles. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated that the difference of the words is semantics. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he has a problem with renaming a program to call it an element. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked Finance Director Beer if it changes the financial reporting from <br />the City by using the word "element". Finance Director Beer indicates he does not foresee any <br />problems, and the only issue may be that some people have become accustomed to the verbiage <br />that was used previously. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated that she agrees with the use of the word "element". <br />Councilmember Thomas noted that there are programs within the elements. <br />Councilmember Gunn wondered if Subdivision 5 should read "...above-described elements..." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.