My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:45:19 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/22/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br />• Resolution Approving Change Orders No. 20 through 26 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. <br />Ayes - 4. Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />J. Resolution 6829 Resolution in Support of Local Cable and Video Provider <br />Franchising <br />City Administrator Ulrich introduced Coralee Wilson, Chief Administrator for the North <br />Suburban Cable Commission (NSCC). <br />Ms. Wilson reported there have been numerous attempts to revise the telecommunication laws at <br />the federal level in light of new technologies and business models. She stated all want more <br />competition to the existing cable company to keep prices low and enhance customer service. Ms. <br />Wilson noted that as companies come in, they provide advanced telecommunication services to <br />serve residents and businesses and a good economic tool. Unfortunately, large national <br />companies have decided the rules are not appropriate for them and they don't want to abide by <br />the rules and come to local governments to get franchises to provide video services because it is <br />too time consuming. However, in the last two years if they had spent as much time and money <br />on complying with the process as to get out of it, they would have most of the franchises at this <br />point. <br />Ms. Wilson advised there are now two legislative bills, one of which got to the floor of the House <br />• to allow companies to come in with very little ability by the community to manage or control the <br />manner in which they do that. She reported that HR 5252 was introduced in the House in March, <br />has been through both subcommittee and committee votes; and if voted on today, it would pass. <br />Also, Senator Stevens introduced a bill and it will likely go to markup after June 5, 2006. <br />Ms. Wilson stated she had handed out a summary on bill S 2686, which is worse than the House <br />bill and creates a national franchise through the FCC. The Senate bill creates a local franchise <br />through a form created by the FCC. In both bills there is 30 days to approve a franchise, which <br />does not provide the City enough time to study whether they have sufficient financial backing. <br />Ms. Wilson noted the current franchise law gives the City enough time to assure the company is <br />capable of managing a cable system. In addition, both bills limit public access to 1 % of gross <br />revenue, which will limit them to about $218,000. Their current budget is over $1 million so <br />with a reduction to $218,000 there would be severe cut backs in the ability for CTV to serve the <br />community. She stated she has heard from legislators that the City should give up some of their <br />5% franchise fee to support public access but that is a rental fee to use the public right-of--way. <br />She stated her opinion that the franchise company should compensate the City because they are <br />using public property (rights-of--way). Ms. Wilson explained the PEG fee is a programming fee <br />and should pay for locally produced programming as well. <br />Ms. Wilson advised that with these bills, the City would lose control of its public rights-of--way. <br />The bill says the City will retain that control but if the national franchise does not like the City's <br />• rules and regulations, they can appeal to the FCC, not a court, requiring the City to send their <br />attorney to Washington, D.C. or hire an attorney from there. Under the Senate bill, if the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.