Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting ,Page 21 <br />• loses the case and the FCC thinks the City has abused its authority, the FCC can order the City to <br />pay the legal fees of the license holder and costs associated with the appeal. This will inhibit the <br />ability for the City to protect and enforce its rights-of--way. <br />Ms. Wilson stated these bills will allow national franchise companies to come into the City and <br />take over the area. They also do not have to serve all of Mounds View and can select the most <br />lucrative areas to provide service. Currently, the cable company is required to serve the entire <br />community within a reasonable amount of time, considering the density threshold. <br />Ms. Wilson stated that Representative Ramstad said he is not interested in inserting the <br />requirement to serve the entire community. She explained that under the Senate bill, once a <br />company applies for a national franchise to serve Mounds View, Comcast can get out of its <br />existing franchise and there is nothing to prohibit them from increasing their prices where there is <br />no competition and vice versa. <br />Ms. Wilson stated another concern is that due to the short period of time to approve the <br />application at the FCC or local level, the bill allows Qwest and Verizon to get into the business. <br />She noted there can be unscrupulous people making application with no intention of building the <br />system or building it out completely, so it creates an opportunity for speculation using the City's <br />public rights-of--way as the lure. <br />Ms. Wilson advised the Senate bill includes a definition of gross revenues, which will drastically <br />• cut back what the City is receiving. However, the gross revenue definition contained in the <br />House bill is not as bad as the Senate bill. <br />Ms. Wilson stated the resolution before the Council addresses both pieces of legislation. She <br />encouraged the Council to contact members of the Minnesota Delegation because the only way to <br />slow down the bills or stop them is if all stand and speak together. Ms. Wilson stated the <br />information she provided has been prepared by a local coalition of government associations and <br />based on the Senate bill, which is similar to the House bill. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked how the Minnesota Senators stand on this issue. Ms. Wilson <br />stated they have been talking with them but not been able to get a sense in how they will vote. <br />She stated they will be meeting with Senator Coleman in the next few weeks and Senator <br />Ramstad has not yet been brief on this bill. Ms. Wilson stated the League of Minnesota Cities is <br />working on this issue and the City needs to do the same. <br />Mayor Marty asked how long she has known about the bills. Ms. Wilson stated the House bill <br />came up in mid-March and the first draft of the House bill was out in September of last year. <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked who introduced the bill. Ms. Wilson stated it was Joe Barton, the <br />Senator from Texas who is the Chair of the House Conference Committee. <br />• Ms. Wilson explained they have been working with staff from the inside to try and get the needed <br />language. In mid-March they saw the House bill and had hoped the Senate bill would be better, <br />