Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 9, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />1 will be dedicated to public transit assistance and no more than 60% dedicated to highway <br />2 purposes. He stated such language is the most controversial aspect of the proposed legislation. <br />3 <br />4 Mr. Nustad noted how the funds would be allocated. He stated growth in general fund revenues <br />5 will more than replace the funds being moved for this project. <br />6 <br />7 Mr. Nustad explained the deficiencies of the amendment. He said it would not be a "quick fix" <br />8 for needed amendments, would not eliminate the legislature's ability to direct transportation <br />9 funding to different regions of the State, nor would it raise taxes. <br />10 <br />11 Mr. Nustad explained the Minnesotans for Better Roads and Transit (MBRT) group and what <br />12 they do. He said the group is a broad coalition dedicated to improving transportation comprised <br />i3 of more than 900 organizations and businesses. He stated the group was formed to support <br />14 passage of the Minnesota's Transportation Amendment, and plans to spend $3-4 million <br />15 supporting the amendment. <br />16 <br />17 Mr. Nustad noted there is no group opposing roads, but there is one legislator who believes the <br />18 language is too difficult for the average citizen to understand. <br />19 <br />20 Mr. Nustad noted several organizations and groups who are members of MBRT. He stated there <br />21 is public consensus that new revenue is needed for transportation improvements and that <br />• 22 transportation taxes should be used for transportation. <br />23 <br />24 Mr. Nustad went over fact vs. fiction regarding transportation and the current budget and <br />25 spending. He said that there is the perception that Minnesota's Transportation Amendment will <br />26 result in budget cuts in other parts of the State budget. He explained that State revenues typically <br />27 grow by hundreds of millions of dollars (or billions) each year. He said that by phasing in the <br />28 amendment over five years, the impact on the growth in State revenue would only be $60 million <br />29 annually. <br />30 <br />31 Mr. Nustad stated that some believe the State Constitution should not be changed to dedicate <br />32 taxes. He responded to the argument, saying that the Minnesota Constitution already dedicates <br />33 two taxes for transportation -gas tax and vehicle license tab fees. <br />34 <br />35 Mr. Nustad said that Minnesota's Transportation Amendment would not be easily passed because <br />36 the threshold for passing a constitutional amendment is a majority of all voters. He explained <br />37 that the absence of a vote is a "no" vote on the ballot. <br />38 <br />39 Mr. Nustad also stated that a fictional belief is that Minnesota's Transportation Amendment <br />4o would only take care of metro transit projects. He explained that State law already exists to <br />41 direct funding from motor vehicle sales tax to both roads and transit throughout the State and the <br />42 amendment will not change that. He stated that is the reason nearly 900 organizations support <br />43 the amendment. <br />• 44 <br />45 Mr. Nustad thanked the Council for allowing him to discuss the issue. He encouraged the City to <br />