Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 9, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• 1 Mayor Marty agreed with Councilmember Thomas that Director Ericson should speak with the <br />2 Rice Creek Watershed District regarding their setback requirements, particularly regarding <br />3 drainage ditches and ponds. <br />4 <br />5 Director Ericson asked the Council if Spring Lake should be considered wetland. He stated <br />6 historically the City has treated it as a lake, not a wetland, and has not required 100-foot buffers. <br />7 Mayor Marty stated he would consider the area a lake and that no action would be taken. <br />8 <br />9 Mr. Schnor asked if the holding pond on Spring Lake Road was considered a wetland, how it <br />to would affect the PUD. Director Ericson responded it would not affect any kind of redevelopment <br />11 scenario and it would still be considered a storm water holding pond. He stated the City controls <br />12 the holding pond so it could not be included in any redevelopment activity as a storm water <br />13 management pond. Mr. Schnor asked if his property would be grandfathered in. Director <br />14 Ericson stated it would be up to Mr. Schnor if he wanted to redevelop in the area. <br />15 <br />16 Mr. Schnor asked how a wetland designation would affect property value. Director Ericson <br />17 replied that there is no clear answer, but it certainly would not decrease property value, but could <br />I8 potentially increase it. <br />19 <br />20 MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/FLAHERTY. To continue the public hearing until the next <br />21 Council meeting on October 23, 2006. <br />• 22 <br />23 Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />24 <br />25 F. Informational Presentation regarding the upcoming referendum on the <br />26 Transportation Constitutional Amendment. Powerpoint Presentation by <br />27 Bruce Nustad, President, Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce. <br />28 <br />29 Mr. Nustad explained the role of the Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce and gave the <br />3o Council some background about traffic issues plaguing the Twin Cities area. He stated that <br />31 transportation hassles are experienced daily, that they have been perceived as getting worse, and <br />32 are viewed as a State issue, which has created the "perfect political storm." <br />33 <br />34 Councilmember Thomas returned at 8:09 p.m. <br />35 <br />36 Mr. Nustad explained that there have been transportation solutions in the past that have been <br />37 difficult to pass due to geopolitical issues. He explained that only 54% of the 6.5% vehicle sales <br />38 tax that raises about $6 billion dollars annually is dedicated to transit and highways. <br />39 <br />4o Mr. Nustad explained that there is a ballot amendment which will do three things: <br />41 1. Dedicate all existing tax, <br />42 2. Phase in over 5 years, and <br />43 3. Create a balanced formula for using the funding. <br />44 <br />45 Mr. Nustad stated it will be a constitutional amendment so, over a 5-year period, 40% of funds <br />