My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 2:06:13 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked about the rest of Red Oak Drive and stated that there were many <br />people who requested it be done. Director Lee said Red Oak Drive would be somewhat <br />problematic since there have been no surveys of people to the north. He said the projects need to <br />terminate at some point, and that not everything can be one at once. He said in terms of Red Oak <br />Drive, it could become disjointed and it will be determined by the study. <br />Councilmember Gunn asked about the infrastructure that will be redone, and why the portion of <br />Sherwood Road will be excluded. Director Lee responded that a televising of the systems is <br />being done currently and if it is not included in the current project, it will be added to another <br />project 3-5 years down the road. <br />Director Lee said the segment along Sherwood Road will be a main haul road for the project and <br />it made sense to include it in the project. <br />Councilmember Thomas was under the impression that all seven areas of infrastructure have <br />been televised. Public Works Director Lee said it was done 7 years ago and it will be re - <br />televised, along with the storm sewer. Mayor Marty stated he is okay with Red Oak Drive not <br />being included in the project, and people will see the new road and become more excited about <br />having theirs redone. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked about the width of the street, and Director Lee said that will be 28 <br />feet curb to curb. IIe said within the study area, streets are about 28 feet curb -to -curb, if not a bit <br />wider. Mayor Marty asked if they will be slightly narrower and Director Lee replied that yes they <br />would be slightly narrower and that in the 2004 project, there was a slight decrease in width. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked about curbing and the costs difference in the barrier curb if it was <br />made from bituminous rather than concrete. IIe asked Public Works Director Lee if he ever <br />presented the cost difference to the citizens. <br />Director Lee stated there is not a surmountable bituminous curb option, and the cost difference <br />would be about the same, if there were, he said the cost is negligible. Councilmember Stigney <br />asked about the cost of a bituminous -lipped curb versus the concrete barrier curb. Director Lee <br />stated the cost difference is negligible and there is no option for a bituminous lipped curb. <br />Mayor Marty asked about the difference in costs and Director Lee responded there is no <br />difference in costs between bituminous -lipped curbs or a bituminous barrier curb. He stated <br />building the "lip" is probably not an option because contractors will not build it. He added that <br />most cities are not going with bituminous curbs. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the cost difference between the bituminous "lip" curb and <br />concrete barrier curb is $186. Director Lee stated that most bituminous "lip" curbs are either <br />buried under soil or have been shaved off over the years by snowplows etc. Councilmember <br />Stigney stated he questions the difference in costs. Director Lee said the total project difference <br />in cost is $122,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.