My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 2:06:13 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 25 <br />Mr. Amundsen stated he did some research and the contractor indicated they can always raise the <br />edge of the "shoe" and roll it somewhat with their machinery, but will have to build the back of <br />the curb with an extra pass. IIe stated he cannot believe that two passes will cost the same as <br />one. <br />Mr. Amundsen stated he had heard that citizens are frustrated with traffic patterns, and in South <br />Minneapolis, several options were used to divert traffic patterns from the neighborhoods. He <br />recommended that Mounds View look into such solutions. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the difficulty of shifting the traffic pattern is that some cars will <br />go through other peoples' roads. She stated that if Red Oak Drive is blocked, cars will go to <br />Groveland Road and that the number of cars will not be changed, they will just go somewhere <br />else. She added there is a major thoroughfare and the Council must be cognizant of the <br />problems. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she believes a study is necessary to determine where to move the <br />traffic. She stated she agrees with Mr. Amundsen and does not believe there is such a small <br />difference in price between bituminous and concrete. <br />Mayor Marty questioned sidewalks and trail ways and asked what it will cost to include those in <br />the feasibility report. Director Lee responded it would probably cost several thousand dollars. <br />Mayor Marty said in the past, there was a comprehensive trail way map. He added that traffic is <br />not diminishing, it is increasing. He said having an avenue for people to walk and bike should be <br />considered in the feasibility report. <br />Councilmember Gunn said most neighborhoods do not want sidewalks, and that the Council <br />should not consider it. Director Lee said that it could be a matter of just striping the road as was <br />suggested in the 1992 report. Councilmember Thomas said her concern is that if they present <br />something the neighborhood does not want, that they will say "no" to the entire project. She said <br />she would prefer to give the citizens what they asked for. <br />Councilmember Flaherty said he agrees with Councilmember Thomas that sidewalks were off the <br />table. IIe said the only issue he remembers was the question of bituminous versus concrete <br />curbs. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked about closing the access from Fairchild Avenue to County Road <br />10, and about the survey results. Director Lee responded that there was not a survey taken, and <br />there were no comments regarding Fairchild Avenue to County Road 10 on the comment forms. <br />Councilmember Thomas said she recalled things written in on the feedback form regarding <br />closing Fairchild to County 10. Councilmember Stigney said he believes they should talk to <br />residents first. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.