Laserfiche WebLink
.`s <br />h.• � n <br />11 <br />May 3, 1976 <br />r Willard Haro <br />3048 County Road H-2 <br />Moundsview, MN 55432 <br />Dear Sir <br />Subj: Property - 3048 County <br />Moundsview, Minnesota <br />Laboratory #9-6908 <br />twin city testing <br />ano engineering laboratorwonc. <br />E62 CRUMVIELL AVENUE <br />ST PAL11 MN 55114 <br />PHONE 6121C453601 <br />Road H-2 <br />This letter concerns the recent soil inspection our firm performed <br />at the residential lots. We received authorization for this work <br />% from you on April 23, 1976. <br />OFFICERS: <br />CHARLES W. BRITZIUS, P.E. <br />President <br />JOHN F. GISLASON. P.E. <br />Executive Vice -President <br />NORMAN E. HENNING, P.E. <br />Vice -President Engineedng <br />ALBERT C. HOLLER, F.A.I.C. <br />Vice -President Chemistry <br />CUNTON R. EUE <br />Secretary -Treasurer <br />We understand you proposed to upgrade approximately one and one-half <br />residential lots with 3' of off -site fill material. The lots oand <br />cerned consist of your existing <br />istthe eastdadjacent4lotounWe 2were not given <br />the rear (south) portionof <br />any specific lot dimensions at this time. We also understand that <br />the you do not know the number, location or when <br />Howeverl,SYouction would like <br />houses .wilI be initiated on this'property. <br />to place fill at this time, to make the area more usable, <br />Our investigation consisted ofplacing <br />several shallow <br />wd were vhand auger <br />borings about the property. Thes <br />ly <br />and manually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Clas- <br />sification System, and estimates were made of their strength <br />properties. From the north side of the lot where your house is <br />located, the ground surface sloped down to aareaFalongltSw southea <br />A drainage ditch existed The soil conditions encountered in this low <br />edge of your property. 6" to 1' of organic <br />area consisted of several inches of peat overlying <br />st dense light brown silty sand (SM). <br />silty clay and then moiWe kin <br />did not encounter more than 1.5' of organic soils at any of our <br />ios in this area <br />iny <br />thewe <br />ewateratable isFverya <br />rom pshllow andethe9soilnmoisture could, <br />dueow <br />to this condition. <br />soils be removed from areas to <br />locaplantions wouldand be tomensions have <br />completely <br />receive <br />We would recommend that all organic <br />been foundations. <br />detertnined,the best foundation <br />BRANCH OFFICES: <br />BISMARCK. N.D. <br />FARGO, N.D. <br />GRAND FORKS, N.D. <br />MINOT, N.D. <br />EAU CLAIRE. WIS. <br />LA CROSSE, WIS. <br />MANKATO, MINN. <br />ROCHESTER, MINN. <br />SIOUX FALLS, S.D. <br />- WATfRL00; IDWA <br />AS A NuTuAL PROTECTION 10 CUENTS THE PURUC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS MBFIOPE <br />E SUBMiTT[D AS iHF CONFORM pRITT OF OUENTS /NO AUTHORIZATION FOR , <br />PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSK" "' OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORT 6 RESERVED PENDING OUR MVr1EN APPPIOVAL <br />