My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:31:39 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:26:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council ^ , <br />FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development (J�/'/ <br />i <br />DATE: May 5, 1903 <br />SUBJECT: 11ANSON/DALBERG REZONING AND MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST <br />FOR LOT LOCATED AT 7734-7742 SILVER LAKE ROAD AND <br />7767 GROVELAND ROAD <br />On April 25, 1983 the City Council held a public hearing and first <br />reading for a rezoning of a portion of the lots referenced above. <br />On May 4, 1983 the attached letter was received from Mr. Dalberg <br />requesting continuance of second reading until the Council could <br />consider an alternate rezoning proposal from Mr. Dalberg as explained <br />in the attached letter and sketch. <br />Since the Council proceeded with a rezoning from R-1 to R-2 (;:ot the <br />requested R-3) and took no action on the subdivision requept, the <br />following items need to be resolved: <br />1) If the three lots in question are not subdivided then <br />the existing parcels fronting Silver Lake Road will <br />become non -conforming due to lack of width. <br />2) The development plan currently before the Council cannot <br />be approved due to improper zoning and will need to be <br />revised or withdrawn by applicant or denied by the Council. <br />Staff recommends that before the second reading of the rezoning the <br />property be subdivided into two lots with a minimum of 100 feet of <br />frontage. If applicant does not want to revise his original plan <br />or the Council does not agree with applicant's alternate plan, then <br />staff recommends that the Council either table Ordinance No. 339 <br />indefinately or deny rezoning and second reading. <br />JCJ/bc <br />Attachment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.