Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Coimnission <br />Page 2 <br />April 13, 1983 <br />rl <br />D-3 zone, even though a residential structure exists on one of thesL <br />commercial lots. Thus, the minimum sclback hclwaan the motel <br />structure and the lot line which soparate:: the metal from the single <br />family home would be 10 feet. The site plan is proposing 30 feet. <br />Rice Creek. Watershed District approved a permit (73-G4) on January <br />16, 1974 based on Lhc following data: <br />1) Total drainage area 20.7 acres. <br />2) Total ulL•imaL•c impervious 7.3 acres (36%). <br />3) Pond storage volume below 884.5 of 0.8 acre-feet. <br />4) Outlet discharge of 6.0 cubic feat par second or greater. <br />5) Ten year, 2 hour design storm which is a 2.5 inch rainfall. <br />Chapter 49A requires the following: <br />1) Maximum rate of discharge for undeveloped property be at a <br />rate equal to the 5 year storm which in estimated to be 10 <br />cubic feel• per second. <br />2) Runoff between 5 year, 24 hour and 50 year, 24 hour event k' <br />must be detained on site. This is estimated to be 4.44 <br />acre-feet for total development-, and 0.63 acre-feet for <br />proposed development. <br />Initial analysis would conclude that either the runoff assumptions <br />for the Rice Creek Watershed permit were too low or that proposed <br />development will utilize over 75 percent of the proposed 0.8 acre-feet <br />of storage. Staff, therefore, concludes that the proposed catchment <br />(pending) area may be significantly undersized for total (20.5 acre) <br />development to meet current requirements for Chapter 49A. <br />Staff recommends applicant: <br />1) Reevaluate storm water runoff taking into consideration the <br />proposed and future development. <br />2) Resubmit data to Rice Creek Watershed District for update <br />and reapproval, if necessary. <br />3) Establish drainage easement over catchment and future develop- <br />ment on the balance of the lot being subdivided. Additional <br />future drainage casement may be required when land use and a <br />more exact determination of impervious area can be made. <br />4) That existing skimmer be modified to allow emergency overflow <br />in the event that skimmer inlet becomes plugged or frozen. <br />