My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/09/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/09/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:50:03 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/20/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1982 <br />Regular Meeting Page Three <br />--------------------------------------------------------- ------ <br />Director Johnson explained the City has not con - <br />I^ ducted any tests during the past 20-30 days, other <br />than standard tests on the drinking water, which was <br />acceptable. lie stated that Mounds View has been producing an <br />extraordinarily high amount of water this past summer, <br />which makes the water problem more noticeable and <br />wide -spread. He added that they hope to have an <br />answer within 30-60 days. <br />Councilmember Forslund asked if Ms. Weigand would <br />like the samples analyzed that she presented to the <br />Council. Ms. Weigand replied that she would, and <br />she also stated she would be glad to answer questions <br />and provide additional samples to whoever works on <br />the problem. <br />Mayor McCarty asked if the City could agree that the <br />tests run by the State are reliable for health <br />standards. Director Johnson replied they could. <br />He added that since it was a very busy time of the <br />year, it might take longer than usual to have the <br />samples analyzed. <br />The Council discussed Item B and determined the <br />correct amount of payment was $48,224,91. <br />Mayor McCarty asked that Item G be removed for <br />discussion. <br />Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve the consent <br />agenda, minus Item G, and waive the reading of the <br />resolutions. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Mayor McCarty stated that there seemed Lo be some <br />continuing confusion over Item G, that while the <br />salary was correct, he was opposed to changing the <br />grade level and moved that it be a Level XI. <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend Resolution <br />M_O-MTo set the level of responsibility as a <br />Level XI. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to adopt Resolution <br />ne. w an waive the reading, <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />This presentation was made earlier in the meeting, <br />during the residents requests and comments from <br />the floor. <br />7. Approval of <br />Consent Agenda <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />8. Presentation of <br />Petition from <br />Residents on <br />Lois Drive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.