My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/10/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/10/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:31:30 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/11/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VTFW <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />UNAPPRO/m Regular Meeting <br />October 11, 1982 <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order <br />Mayor McCarty at 7:37 PM. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call <br />otyIf Hors and Mayor McCarty. <br />ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Mevers, flerk/Admini- <br />strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development <br />Director Johnson. <br />Mayor McCarty clarified his position, and the feel- 3. ADDroval of <br />ings of the Council, regarding the delinquent tax Minutes: <br />bills as discussed at the September 27 meeting, and September 27, <br />misrepresented in the New Brighton Bulletin. He 1982 and Octobe <br />—emphasized that the Council was not angry with Staff. 4. 1982 <br />.otion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to express a complete <br />and total vote of confidence in favor of the Staff <br />members. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />It was also noted that while the bids came in higher <br />than projected for the Oak Park project, the cost is <br />to be paid by the developer, and not the City. <br />Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the September <br />777MT—minutes as corrected. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the <br />bcto er 82 minutes as presented. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to recind the motion <br />made by McCarty, seconded by Doty, on October 4, <br />1982, directing Staff to send a second letter in <br />reference to unpaid utility bills. <br />ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to take Resolution <br />No. 5� 02 from the table. <br />5 ayes 0 nay:, Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.