Laserfiche WebLink
CASE 89-81 <br />I'age 3 <br />CPublic Improvements and Services: <br />1) This plan .is i.dcntical to the one submitted in May of 1981 <br />for review by the Planning Commission on June 3, 1981. <br />Pan 0oxrud of :Ihorl.-Iilli.otl-Ilendrickson reviewed the <br />('evelopment• at that- time (a copy of: his report dated May <br />29, 19111, is aLLached). <br />2) The requiremenL•s of Resolution No. 983 have been met. <br />3) Sanitary sewer service is adequate. <br />4) The developer is proposing the installation of a watermain <br />to connect to the existing main on Spring Lake Road. Utility <br />easements would need to be acquired to cross to Spring Lake <br />Road. Tile location of this proposed watermain will, as pro- <br />posed by the developer., cross the property to the west not <br />on a lot line but approximately 100 feet north of its south <br />lot line (Lot 27). This lot and the lots west of it are iq <br />Spring Lake Park. <br />5) No drainage easements are shown on the property. <br />C6) The Fire Chief has reviewed this development previously and with the exception of the width of the emergency only access <br />being too narrow (24 foot wide improved area), the plan meets <br />with his approval. <br />Access: <br />1) The issue was brought up in previous meetings that the <br />properties to the west of this development may want to sub- <br />divide off the back of their lots in the future. <br />2) Should the property to the east decide to develop, right-of- <br />way for a frontage road should be required so that an addi- <br />tional curb cut onto highway 10 be avoided. <br />C <br />