Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 10, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page Six <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />that a vendor or anyone installing a sign would <br />be required to be licensed in the City, and that a <br />permit is required for each sign, and the fees <br />involved can only be waived for a religious or <br />civic organization, by the City Council. He also <br />noted that permits can be approved by the Clerk/ <br />Administrator, but that special approval is <br />needed from the Council for unusual, or illuminated, <br />signs. He noted that if the Council approves the <br />sign in question, it would be sufficient autho- <br />rization for the Clerk/Administrator to issue a <br />permit. <br />Mr. McFarlane stated the problem is in having a <br />permit required for each sign and each time one <br />is rented or placed. Attorney Meyers replied <br />that the ordinance does call for a permit each <br />time. <br />There was discussion among the Council regarding <br />the fees, and it was noted the resolution that <br />set- the fees would have to be researched. There <br />was also concern expressed about the placement <br />of the signs. <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council <br />re ergetmporary sign issue to the Planning <br />Commission for their recommendation. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Johnson stated he would have the Planning <br />Department see if it could be added to the next <br />Planning. Commission agenda, and get back to <br />Mr. McFarlane. <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve the <br />labor -relations subscriber service renewal, in <br />the amount of $1,485.00, <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Johnson reported they have received 3 <br />quotations for the repair of the drive shaft in <br />well #2, with the low bid being from Robert <br />Rode, at $550, versus $1,025 and $1,280. He <br />explained Mr. Rode does this work on the side <br />and has access to the required machinery. He <br />also stated Mr. Rode will guarantee his work. <br />Motion Carried <br />8. Consideration <br />of Staff Memo <br />Regarding <br />Labor Relations <br />Subscriber Svc. <br />Motion Carried <br />9. Report of <br />Director of <br />Public Works/ <br />Community <br />Developme*'- <br />