My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/02/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/02/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:48:57 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Clerk-AdminisLraLor Pauley,4 <br />( Finance Director -Treasurer Brager <br />DATE: February 10, 1983 <br />SUBJECT: WORD PROCESSOR/MICROPROCESSOR PURCHASE RECOMMENDATION <br />The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the recommendation of <br />the City staff with respect to the purchase of a word processor/ <br />microprocessor system for the City of Mounds View and in coordina- <br />tion with two other member cities of the Ramsey County Consortium <br />of Municipalities (RCCM). However, prior to giving our recommenda- <br />tion and rationale, staff would like to outline the process followed <br />by RCCM and the Mounds View City staff in determining what type of <br />system would be suitable and in screening those bids received to <br />determine which one best fit the specifications, our financial <br />limitations, and our identified needs. <br />The process began prior to the development of the 1983 Revenue Sharing <br />Budget when staff representatives of RCCM's member cities began <br />discussion to determine what modifications could be made to the <br />Consortium's operations. One of the more obvious improvements <br />identified as being needed was a change in operations which would <br />eliminate the inherent delays in data input resulting from our use <br />of batch processing (input of data on keypunched cards), the cost <br />of keypunching and data delivery services, and loss of control of <br />the input and editing processes. These difficulties are easily <br />overcome by implementing a direct data entr•1 function where the <br />member cities input data directly into the County computer from a <br />remote terminal at their facilities and edit all information before <br />the finished output product is run. <br />Such a direct (remote) data entry function can easily be performed <br />in a "dumb terminal" leased from the County. This terminal would <br />be capable of no other function but input of data and correction <br />of information before final output. An alternative would be the <br />purchase of a "smart terminal" which would not only allow data <br />input but would also be capable of performing in-house data processing <br />and word processing functions. Comparing the lease of a "dumb <br />terminal" to the purchase of a "smart terminal" it was realized that <br />the purchase would be paid back in approximately two to three years. <br />After reaching this conclusion it became necessary to determine <br />what functions we would want this "smart terminal" to perform in <br />addition to remote data entry to the County computer, the type of <br />system these functions would dictate and the configuration of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.