My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:57:05 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:57:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/28/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
T'O: Mayor & Council <br />FROM: Finance DiI-N-tor-Treasurer III, <br />Utility Accounting Clerk Sandgren j <br />DATE: March 31, 1983 <br />RE: PROPOSED UTILITY OILL COLLECTION POLICIES <br />As of March 23, 1983 the City was owed a total of $16,844.30 of <br />delinquent utility bills. Of this amount $7,276.63 was payable <br />from the fourth quarter 1982 billing which was due February 28, 1983 <br />and $9,567.67 was payable from third quarter 1982 and earlier billings. <br />At the present time the computer program for utility billings and <br />collections does not identify on a per account basis the quarter (s) <br />for which an account is delinquent. We are only able to determine if <br />a particular account is delinquent for the current billing. If the <br />account has a balance forward, that balance is from the previous <br />quarter or quarters. <br />During a review of the City's collection policies we found that the <br />policies and procedures which have been followed for many years were <br />not formally adopted by this Council or past Councils. We feel that <br />it is in the best interests of the City and its utility customers to <br />have a formally adopted collection policy. We have prepared a draft <br />of a proposed policy for your consideration which is attached and <br />includes samples of letters and notices sent to customers with delin- <br />quent accounts. It is basically the policy which has been informally <br />followed for many years. <br />Past discussions with the City Attorney have indicated that in most <br />instances it is not cost effective to pursue legal remedies to enforce <br />collection of delinquent utility bills. The only cost effective <br />methods left to us after gentle persuasion has failed are discontinuation <br />of water service until the balance due has been paid and/or certification <br />to the County for collection with tax bills the following year. <br />We have made use of a promissory agreement whereby a customer would <br />pay the delinquent balance due in installment payments. This has had <br />only limited success. To illustrate: after notices were sent last <br />fall to customers with delinquent accounts, eight promissory agreements <br />were signed. At the present time three customers are fulfilling or <br />have fulfilled their agreements. <br />Discontinuation of service is a last resort after a customer has not <br />responded to the current billing and a reminder letter. On the average <br />we sent 200-250 reminder notices each quarter. After that we send a <br />notice that the account is in danger of having service discontinued. <br />This averages 75-125 notices each quarter. We then attempt to reach <br />approximately 25-30 customers by phone to advise that they are in <br />danger of having service discontinued due to non payment. Finally a <br />certified letter is sent to approximately 12 customers advising that <br />service will be discontinued on a specified date due to non payment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.