Laserfiche WebLink
r 1 C, <br />MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development <br />DATE: September 28, 1983 <br />SUBJECT: PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE STREETLIGHT REQUEST <br />Per Council direction alternate streetlight locations were <br />evaluated along Pleasant View Drive. Attached are the following <br />items: <br />1. Original Petition. <br />2. Map of the Area. <br />3. Memo dated 9/15/83 from Engineering/ <br />Planning Technician. <br />4. Copy of Resolution No. 1354. <br />Staff has reviewed possible or probable streetlight locations along <br />Pleasant View. There are two existing streetlights, one at <br />Highway 10 and the other at 84th Avenue. There is also a street- <br />light approximately 100 feet east of Pleasant View on Pleasant View <br />Court. <br />Based on Resolution No. 1354 requirement for 400 foot spacing, <br />staff has shown where the streetlight might be located. As can be <br />seen by the sketch, location A (between 8320 and 8330 Pleasant View) <br />is a preferred location based on distance spacing criteria. <br />The three alternates evaluated by staff include: <br />Alternate A - original petition location. <br />Alternate B - across the street (between 8325 and 8335 <br />Pleasant View) from petitioned location. <br />This location would require $300.00 to <br />set a pole and string a wire from the <br />existing transformer. <br />Alternate C - North or south of location Alternate A <br />near existing transformer pads. <br />Mr. Praunendienst rejected either loca- <br />tion as being too far from his property <br />to resolve his concerns. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff concludes that location Alternate A best <br />meets Mr. Praunendienst's concern, meets Resolution No. 1354 <br />spacing criteria, and eliminates the $300.00 cost for a new pole. <br />Please advise as to the direction the Council wishes to proceed. <br />JCJ/Pf <br />Attachments <br />