Agenda Packets - 1983/10/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�y Page 2 f Subcommittee Meeting OTHER SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS WILL: 1. Ask other applicable questions. a. Are city councils aware of Screening Committee rules? b. What financial impact the rules would have on each community. C. Status and support of 5-year Capital Improvement Fund. d. What is anticipated construction next year to avoid the nrnblem being continued. The primary screening committee rules that are applicable are: That, whenever a municipality exceeds $300,000, or two Limes their annual construction allotment (whichever is greater) in the construc- tion fund balance available as of June 30th of the current year, not including the current year's allotment, the Unencumbered Construc- tion Fund Subcommittee will review and allow the city in question to explain the reason for the large balance. Seven communities were reviewed by the subcommittee. Their fund situation, a brief outline of project status, and the subcommittee recommendation to the screening committee is provided for each city. AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1983 CONSTRUCTION AS OF 6/30/83 ALLOTMENT RATIO I. CRYSTAL $1,658,426 $180,234 9.20 The City of Crystal has had its needs adjusted for the past 3 years. William Sherburne, City Engineer, called George Quickstad of Mn/DOT prior to the meet- ing. He indicated to Mr. Quickstad that there was no new information available and the status of the situation was the same as had been last year. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The construction needs for the City of Crystal be reduced by 5 times their present construction fund balance less the current consrrnr- tion allotment period. AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1983 CONSTRUCTION AS OF 6/30/83 ALLOTMENT RATIO 2. CHASKA $432,366 $202,733 2.13 Glenn Cook of the consulting firm of Bonestroo, Roselle, Anderlik and Associates, represented the city at the meeting. lie indicated that the city is currently developing a project in cooperation with Mn/DOT to construct traffic control improvements along TH 41 at Crosstown Blvd., Engler Road and Hunter Road. This $350,000 project would require approximately $100,000 of MSAS funds from the City of Chaska. The project is in location design status now and may be taken to contract before the end of the year. The city is also reviewing projects to be taken to construction in the next few years. These include Staughton, Co. Rd. 10 and Pioneer Rd. They hope to get a $400,000 project moving by the end of this year and another in June of 1984. -59-