Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br />Subcommittee Meeting <br />The city is still hopeful of the project moving quickly enough to meet the <br />rules and will be sending a letter to George Quickstad before October, 1983, <br />updating the situation. <br />1 <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: The construction needs for the City of Chaska be reduced <br />by 2 times their present construction fund balance less current construction <br />allotment prior to the 1983 apportionments, unless significant progress is made <br />in accordance with the guidelines which would result in the unencumbered con- <br />struction fund balance being reduced by December 31, 1983,conform to the regu- <br />lation. In the event that the screening committee accepts the probability that <br />the construction will, indeed, occur late in 1983 and does not move to have the <br />construction needs adjusted and said project does not, in fact, move at the <br />anticipated rate before the end of 1983; then is is further recommended that <br />in 1984 the needs be adjusted for the City of Chaska by reducing it by a factor <br />of 2 times the balance in the construction fund that existed as of June 30, 1983. <br />AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1983 CONSTRUCTION <br />AS OF 6/30/83 ALLOTMENT RATIO <br />3. HUTCHINSON $358,563 $151,016 2.37 <br />Marlow Priebe, Director of Engineering for the City of Hutchinson, represented <br />the community at the meeting. He stated that this past year did award a con- <br />tract, but found that past overpayments from the state has caused the entire <br />amount of his requested use of MSAS funds to be eliminated. <br />The city is, however, also progressing on five other MSAS projects with an es- <br />timated total MSAS funding of $236,483. On three of these projects hearings <br />have already been held and it is expected that bids would be taken during 1983. <br />These projects total approximately $87,700 of estimated MSAS funds. The com- <br />mittee indicated that at the very latest, these bid dates should be established <br />by December 1, 1983. <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: The construction needs for the City of Hutchinson be reduced <br />by 2 times their present construction fund less the current construction allot- <br />ment period to the 1983 apportionment unless they have succeeded in progressing <br />projects to the point of having bid dates established by December 1, 1983, which <br />would bring their construction balance into line with the rules. In the event <br />that the screening committee accepts the probability that the construction will, <br />indeed, occur late in 1983 and does not move to have the construction needs ad- <br />justed and said project does not, in fact, move at the anticipated rate before <br />the end of 1983; then it is further recommended that in 1984 the needs be ad- <br />justed for the City of Hutchinson by reducing it by a factor of 2 times the bal- <br />ance in the construction fund that existed as of June 30, 1983. <br />AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1983 CONSTRUCTION <br />AS OF 6/30/83 ALLOTMENT RATIO <br />4. LITCHFIELD $330,095 $114,586 2.88 <br />IWayne Carlson, City Administrator, represented the community at the meeting. <br />He informed the committee that on July 15, 1983, the State Aid Project 47-611-18 <br />-60- <br />