Agenda Packets - 1983/10/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 4 Subcommittee Meeting for the improvement to County State Aid Highway No. 11 48s478nofeMSASCmoneyuc- for has now begun on that project which is utilizing $ from the City of Litchfield. This would reduce their unencumbered construction h meets the criteria set forth in the rules balance to an amount whicbeing consid- An additional expenditure of $222,000 of MSAS fw�ds is cuointtexpected that 1right-of-way Bred by the city for a Ripley St. improvement. At this p problems and matching funds are slowing up the project, but is it will go to contract in the spring of l984. This would avoid the reoccurrence of problems in the forseeahle future. guidelines. RECOMMENDED None, as the community 1s now within the AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1983 CONSTRUCTION RATIO As 0�ALLOTMENT 2.30 $422,789 $184,086 5• MOUNDSVIEW at this meet- John Johnson, Director of Public Works, represented the comm llYcity approach ing. ears and as such been unable to the Re indicated that the city had been developing to storm drainage problems over the last 5 Y this fall to guide had been working "with Ramsey County pursue any projects. Final deliberation is anticipated community in ir.r.future decision. The city are not and the State Co have various improvements done on [hose roadway systems with MSAS funds being utilized for local shares. These projects, however, currently high enough utilized the priority system of these organizations to cause the construction to take place until 1986 or 1987 at the earlier the expecta- projects had been developed by the city before A set of resurfacing tion that this A miles of work would be done late in 1of The day however, the in/DOT review of tbecauseaof thelunCed the subcommittee's meeting, n therefore, to meat that [he projects would not be acceptable for MSAS funding t to modify its Johnson indicated the city would now attempt suitability of the subsoils and the failure of the design, the standards. Mr• rove. original resurfacing plans for the reconstruction of some of these roadways. oint, but every effort would This would result in a change in the schedule and the extent oEatbiduletting went. The actual timeframe is unknown at this Pf establishing _,_ December 1, 1983. le was to provide a letter to Mr. Quickstad by Oct - be made to have this accomplished co cne p date 1, the progress of this endeavor. Ober 1, indicating e City RECOh1h1E_ ND The resen[construction construction fundhbalanceolessuthe currentiew be rcon- unless the city is able duced by 2 times their p on struction allotment prior to the 1tha apportionmentwill make significant progress which a bid date by December 1, 1983, to provide reasonable probability that they Point projects to reach a point of establishing committee accepts would lead to the reduction of the unencumbered construction funds to the P indeed, occur late in 1983 and does where it met the regulation. In the event that the screening the probability that the construction will, does not, in not move to have the construction needs adjusted and said project -61-