My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:06:38 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 11:06:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/24/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MDF Policy No. 3: <br />Regional shopping, employment, cultural, entertainment, governmental and <br />high -density residential facilities should be clustered in centers <br />convenient to the metropolitan transportation system. <br />This is the Council-s concept of major diversified centers. The MDF takes no <br />further steps to make them happen and, in fact (with perhaps the notable <br />exception of Southdale), they did not develop. There are major concentrations <br />of commercial development, but they did not occur in the same areas as the <br />major retail centers (the centers of the Council-s diversified centers). <br />MDF Policy No. 4: <br />A choice of living and working opportunities in the Region should be <br />available to everyone. Opportunities should be increased for low- and <br />moderate -income persons to live in the suburbs, and middle- and upper -income <br />housing should be developed in the central cities. <br />Council housing policies have attempted to make housing available in the sub- <br />urbs where jobs are likely to be, but the Council has no policies that discuss <br />how to develop working opportunities for the poor or the possibility of getting <br />jobs near where they live. <br />What conclusion is to be drawn from the Council-s "economic development" <br />experience under its current policies? The Council recognizes the importance <br />of the regional economy to the well-being of the Region-s residents, but has <br />not been willing to follow through and explicity encourage economic development <br />in the face of other demands and pressures. <br />With this discussion paper, the Council is making economic development impacts <br />a relevant factor in its decision -making process. The Council is proposing <br />economic policies to help the Region achieve some of the goals discussed in the <br />attached policy paper. First, it is necessary to give economic development <br />more visibility in the MDF areawide policies. The policies discussed above are <br />reordered and rewritten in the "Proposed Policies" section. New, more explicit <br />policies are proposed as well. The proposed policies reflect the increased <br />visibility of economic development impacts. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.