Laserfiche WebLink
0[or Dff&ASANC[ ANALYSIS <br />file oppurluniIles available Ia the City of Mounds View with regard to Its <br />"improvement Bond Redemption Funds" are clearly stated in the DeLaliunt Veto Debt <br />/e'\iervice Study. Due to the significant cash holdings in the Fund and the Iowa <br />Interest rates on the debt to be paid from the Fund when compered to yields available <br />on maket Investments, the City finds itself in a position to liberate excess funds by <br />defeasing the existing debt through the establishment of an escrow account. <br />It would appear from the original dates of Issue of the bonds being paid from this <br />fund that the Federal arbitrage regulations will have little If any effect on the <br />proposed defeasance. Also, given that Bond Counsel opines that this type of <br />defeasanceis legal and that it frees upp excess funds in the account, which we expect <br />to be the core, Minnesota Statutes have little to say about this type of transaction. <br />There are, however, some practical considerations. <br />Some of the necessary considerations are as follows: <br />• should the transaction take place and what is the appropriate timing for the <br />transaction considering the following: <br />• market conditions/projections <br />• nature of the securities composing the escrow account/s. <br />• availability of funds with which to purchase securities. <br />• number of issues to defease by escrow. <br />• whether to establish one or five escrow accounts. <br />V what type of investment should be included in the escrow account and what is <br />the best way to secure those investments. <br />• whether a separate verfication of cash flows in required. <br />To demonstrate what the City may anticipate given current market conditions and <br />assuming that the defeasance in completed on November i, 1983, we have selected <br />groupoings of U.S. Treasury Securities and U.S. Government Agency Securities in <br />numbers sufficient to defease each of the old bond issues. To Identify estimated <br />cash needs for the issues on an individual basis, we have structured five separate <br />accounts. This should not necessarily be considiered an endorsement of separate <br />accounts, but merely an illustration. The requirements, based on Thursday, October <br />13, 1983 market quotations, are as follows: <br />Principal <br />Debt Service <br />Cash <br />Bond Issue <br />Outstanding <br />Outstanding_ <br />Requirement <br />1965 <br />b 720,000 <br />S 892,530 <br />62 1,0 5750 <br />62525 <br />1966 <br />1,415,000 <br />1,846,813 <br />, <br />55,062 <br />1968 <br />60,000 <br />185,000 <br />69,000 <br />209,728 <br />174,824 <br />1971 <br />1974 <br />870,000 <br />1,091t763 <br />778,869 <br />Total <br />$3,250,000 <br />$4,109,834 <br />b2.589,050 <br />It is obvious that a substantial amount of cash will be freed up through defeasance <br />of the five Issues. <br />•dividual scshedules supporting the table above can be found in this section. <br />