My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/11/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/11/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:30:00 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 11:29:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/28/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hlayur and City Cuunell <br />Page Two <br />Nu'• abcr 23, 1983 <br />1 <br />canarygrass. These changes in cover type boundary and <br />composition suggest that the wetlands on the property are <br />naturally succeeding to communities characteristic of drier <br />conditions." <br />6. "The net effect of Phase I construction will be a slight <br />decrease in the area of upland forest and upland grass/ <br />shrub and a slight increase in area of wetland vegetation. <br />Wetland vegetation will be more diverse containing portions <br />of inland fresh marsh ('Type II), inland shallow fresh marsh <br />(Type II), inland deep fresh marsh (Type IV) and wooded <br />swamp (Type III). <br />On September 26, 1983, a report was submitted by Braun Environmental <br />Laboratories at the request of the City. The following quotations <br />are excerpted from that report: <br />1. "Our evaluation of the site showed the dominant soils to be <br />the Lino loamy find sand and Markey muck with no evidence <br />of the Isanti and Seelyeville muck." <br />2. "Our results indicate that there are inaccuracies in the <br />Ramsey County Soil Survey and... that the muck type soil is <br />predominantly Markey much rather than Seelyeville." <br />J. "'The vegetation surrounding 1-22 is inturding upon it as the <br />result of natural succession." <br />A. "Based on our evaluation, we feel that there is about 31 <br />acres of wetland in the I-23 classification. ...we would <br />consider the 7 acres as being marginal wetland. We consider <br />these areasmarginal because of the present of transitional <br />species and upland species not normally found in wetland." <br />5. "Without human distrubance or development, wetland number <br />1-22 will succumb to natural succession within approximately <br />50 years. Encroachment by fast-growing, quickly spreading <br />pioneer species has already begun, and the size and land- <br />locked location of the area do not favor its longevity as a <br />wet meadow." <br />6. "Phase I construction will have no discernable effects on the <br />wetland identified in the area previously identified as I-23. <br />The completion of Phase I will result in a slight increase <br />in the amount of Type III, IV and V wetlands as a result of <br />the ponded area." <br />7. "There are less restrictive souls present on the site than <br />described in the Ramsey County Sil Conservation report. The <br />soils on the site are similar to those being built on in <br />the metro area. There is less wetland present on the site <br />than described in either previous report. Phase I develop- <br />ment will des' - 1.1 acres of Type II wetland (I-22)." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.