My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/1984
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SHOR -ELLIOLTINGNEDRICKSOS' INC. <br />r\ - HCHIPY!\\'A f•\II S, NISCO\SIN <br />February 27, 1984 RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA <br />PINECREST PROPERTIES <br />'DRUNK HWY. 10 ACCESS STUDY <br />SEH FILE NO. 84103 <br />Mr. Donald Pauley, City Administrator r�r'.=, (f1t <br />City of Mounds View J <br />2401 Highway 10 C.11p� <br />Mounds View, MN 55112 �:;�J:GS r•_ <br />Dear Mr. Pauley: <br />In conjunction with the Pinecrest Property Development proposal, <br />hway <br />SEH has studied rofacts of this constructingdavmedianncross over beton Trunk ween <br />10 and the potential on <br />Couuty Road H and County Road H-2. BaseduatsCountywRoadvH <br />found that without a median opening, congestion <br />and County Road H-2 will increase due to the turning movements <br />of vehicles trying to access the site. While a new median open- <br />ing would alleviate much of the congestion, it also introduces <br />additional vehicle conflicts at the new crossing. Ultimately, <br />the futu:, completion of new Trunk Highway 10 will result in a <br />significant decrease in traffic volumes for this area, thus <br />improving them peration of a median cross -over - <br />We have met with City Staff and the Minnesot.DepartDent has <br />of <br />Transportation (Mn/DOT) concerning this proposal. <br />agreed to review the operation of Trunk Highway 10 and check the <br />signal coordination for potential installation of aadditDonal <br />sedian npanina. A final recommendation is pending <br />findings. <br />Three alternatives were studied: (1) A full median cross -over <br />at some point between County Road H and County Road H-2, (2) A <br />partial median cross -over permitting left turns from Trunk <br />Highway 10 in either direction, and (3) An alternative without <br />any median openings between County Road H and County Road H-2. <br />We have determined the potential traffic <br />county generation <br />Ho thCounty <br />area <br />immediate to Trunk Highway 10 <br />Road H-2. The assumed land development was taken from the <br />Plan. Pinecrest <br />request befo esi theCity ew oisrsimilar eto the ComprehensivepPlanrties' <br />iW GOPIRR aUn DING -Ili I+.1 1111, "iNn • N r%l 1 n11,wF5OM 55117 • PHOM 161:1 484.0177 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.