My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/1984
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mt. Donald Pau ley, City Administtatot <br />Pubtuaty 27, 111H4 <br />Page 2 <br />Out findings ate illustrated in the attached schematics for each <br />of the three alternatives. The figures show the traffic being <br />generated by the surrounding development only. Through traffic <br />has not been added to these trips. Alternative 1 (full median <br />cross -over) projects a substantial volume of southbound <br />l left <br />turns to the proposed Wooddale Drive access. Approximately <br />conflicts per day would be expected at the Wooddale Drive full <br />cross -over. <br />An increase of approximately 800 vehicles per day is expected on <br />County Road H-2 immediately west of Trunk Highway 10. A <br />majority of these vehicles turn to go either north or south on <br />Highway 10. A very minimal amount of traffic is anticipated to <br />use the local residential streets north of County Road H-2. At <br />the intersection of Trunk Highway 10 and County Road H, 1430 <br />southbound left turns are projected from Highway 10 and 2150 <br />westbound left turns from County Road H were anticipated. <br />Alternate 2 (partial ctoss-over) is illustrated by the second <br />schematic. The conflicts for this case reduce to 2335 at the <br />proposed Wooddale Drive ctoss-over (-40% when compared to <br />Alternative 1, full Ctoss-over). Increased traffic on County <br />Road H-2 more than doubles over Alternative 1 to 1900 vehicles <br />per day. The traffic on H-2 is unbalanced due to trips desiring <br />to proceed southbound on Trunk Highway 10. Little traffic is <br />anticipated to utilize local streets north of County Road H-2. <br />A 41% increase in southbound left turns from Highway 10 to <br />County Road H occurs due to eastbound trip desires from Wooddale <br />Dtive (now prohibited from crossing at Wooddale Drive) and <br />circulating traffic from the commercial development on the south <br />side of Highway 10 desiring to proceed northbound. Westbound <br />left turns from County Road H to Highway 10 increase 32% due to <br />the prohibition against this movement at Wooddale Drive. <br />Alternate 3 (no median openings) is illustrated by the third <br />schematic. Conflicts within the Wooddale Drive connection are <br />now reduced to zero since all movements are "right -in or <br />right -out" only. Traffic on County Road H-2 increases to 2500 <br />vehicles per day, the highest of the three alternatives. This <br />is due to the addition of some vehicles which had been using the <br />southbound left turn at Wooddale Drive (now prohibited). The <br />left turning movements at County Road H also increases <br />dramatically. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.