My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/1984
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
177 <br />o Alternative B. The existing Runway 17-35 threshold would be relo- <br />cated 1,70 feet to the north, and the runway length would be reduced <br />to a total of 4,000 feet. It would serve as a crosswind runway. <br />Existing Runway 11-26 would be lengthened 1,600 feet to the east, for <br />a total length of 4,000 feet, would become the airport's primary <br />runway, and would have an ILS installed with precision approaches <br />from the east. A new parallel runway 3,200 feet long would be <br />constructed 500 feet to the north. It would be a visual runway, and <br />- would serve for flight training operations, <br />o Alternative C. This alternative includes parallel runways in both <br />orientations, providing equal capability, maximum operating flexi- <br />bility, and greatest potential for minimizing aircraft noise expo- <br />sure. The north -south parallel runways would be in the same loca- <br />tion as those for Alternative A. The east -west parallel runways <br />would be in the same location as those described for Alternative B. <br />// The primary runway in the east -west direction would include an ILS <br />with approaches from the east. <br />Parallel runways are proposed in the alternatives to increase operational <br />safety by physically separating high-performance aircraft and itinerant <br />operations from single -engine training activity. Potential conflicts <br />both in the air and on the ground can be avoided and the airport can <br />operate more safely and efficiently than if all traffic is mixed on a <br />single runway. The parallel runway also has Important environmental <br />benefits in that it places the repetitive training activity over areas <br />that are less densely populated, i.e., to the north of the airport for <br />Alternatives B and C, and between the existing runway and 1-35 and north <br />of relocated T.H. 10 for Alternatives A and C. <br />All of the alternatives have been designed to reduce noise exposure to <br />the south In Mounds View. This is accomplished by moving the southerly <br />threshold of the runways to the north either 1,700 feet or 2,600 feet. <br />This shift will significantly raise the altitude of aircraft over the <br />' community and could, in fact, virtually eliminate overflights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.