Laserfiche WebLink
.Mounds View City Council March 12 1984 <br />Regular Meeting _;� Page Five <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />e'`^uncilmember Linke asked if it was necessary to have <br />preliminary study in hand before going into court. <br />,+ttorney Meyers replied that it would be helpful, as <br />if there is an early move to have the case dismissed, <br />he would need the back-up evidence. He added that in <br />seeking a consultant, the City has used all the names <br />available and gotten a very poor response, but Clerk/ <br />Administrator Pauley is contacting them again, trying <br />to get more to respond. <br />Representative Knuth stated he shared concern about <br />entering into a lawsuit over what would happen with <br />the Minneapolis delegation in regard to this issue. <br />tie added he feels the threat is there to upgrade to <br />an intermediate airport, and the Council should be <br />very careful, as their motion was very all -encompassing, <br />and would be better broken down, as there are at least <br />three different opportunities the City could move for- <br />ward on. He advised looking at any actions taken during <br />the legislative session that could trigger a very active <br />response from the Minneapolis delegation, as the <br />response would have to be met by the local membership <br />in the House and Senate. He advised assessing very <br />carefully the response the Minneapolis delegation might <br />have. <br />Ipresentative Knuth also advised the Council to assess <br />the value of the McCarron legislation in place in rela- <br />tionship to the lawsuit and the value of its removal, <br />as if there is no law the Council can point to that is <br />in direct violation, they would not have a strong stand. <br />Mayor McCarty stated the City cannot delay any longer, <br />and allow MAC to expend funds, and if the City does not <br />move, they will face a delaying question from the courts. <br />He recommended asking for an EIS. He also expressed <br />his concern with an MLS, as it would allow the National <br />Guard at the airport. He also explained he had applied <br />for membership on the Metropolitan Council Task Force <br />and been told not to bother. <br />Representative Knuth again cautioned the City on any <br />action they might take, and advised them to look at a <br />progressive lawsuit, which would insure several fallback <br />options. <br />Councilmember Hankner recommended following the plan of <br />action agreed on by the Council 6 or 8 weeks ago, and <br />reminded the Council they need to get their evidence <br />together before proceeding. <br />b Beutel responded to comments by Mayor McCarty con- <br />-erning him and actions he has taken. lie explained <br />he supported alternate C as being the least possible <br />damage the City could live with. He explained he has <br />put in hundreds of hours and personal money in working <br />