Laserfiche WebLink
� March 12, 1984 . <br />Mounds View City Council ;. <br />S Page Six <br />Regular Meeting .. =------------ - ---- <br />on the airport issue. He stated he did suggest the MLS <br />be installed, and pointed out the FAA has had so much <br />trouble adopting MLS standards that MLS equipment would <br />not be available to the Anoka County Airport for at least <br />another, decade. He stated that his personal preference <br />would be for an ILS. <br />Mr. Beutel asked that everyone hang together in fighting <br />dvised that if the City does every - <br />for this cause, but athing now, he expects they would be shot out of the watererts, <br />as the timing is loaded. HHerecommended <br />also informedlthe Council <br />and getting the guns lo <br />that the noise level at the MinneapoTeatest levels/St, Paul leverys <br />tional Airport will soon be at its g <br />due to construction and the move of the Air National <br />Guard to the airport, so he advised laying l <br />ow and <br />staying out of court until the end of the Legislative <br />session . He also pointed out the next Task Foodetmmettog <br />will be held in this area, which would be a <br />make a presentation, as well as a time to question <br />whether there is a need for a second intermediate airport. <br />Dennis Patrini, sing to434 ngetlde an intermediate airportoad, stated he s no <br />Mounds View is g <br />matter what is done, <br />dthreat, asthe <br />theylaresnotnwilling <br />latiires are the biggest <br />to proceed. <br />willi g toblobby ifethesquestionpisrbroughthue <br />pwagainbe, <br />willing Y <br />in the Legislature. Mr. Patrini replied maybe. <br />LeeAnn sporre, a resident of Fridley, stated she is a <br />member of a task force c mmitteeShe Chas that dealt the issue <br />with <br />this issue since day oneWill be dandurecommendedMarch <br />the6City go ahat 11 eadtwith the <br />A <br />meeting, <br />battle now. <br />Mayor McCarty explained part of his frustration and <br />reason for making the motion is that MAC has been <br />incomplete in its answers to Mounds View. <br />Councilmember Hankner pointed out the motion does tie <br />the City into expense, and she does not feel this is <br />strategically the best time to proceed with the lawsuit, <br />and they shuuld instead gather information, and as <br />e best course of action for <br />elected officials, take th <br />the City. • <br />Councilmember Doty questioned whetherif the Council <br />, <br />passes the motion now, it would be premature and if <br />the City would be damaging its position in Court. <br />dis <br />Attorney <br />expert rep.advpossihtrconcerned <br />Methatwilltansweritheb <br />