Laserfiche WebLink
ids View City CouncilMarch 12, 1984 <br />filar Meeting `J� ;� Page Seven <br />C LL - • _ .: <br />;tions in all areas, and they must be able to name all <br />issues involved, and have appropriate supporting <br />fence. He added he needs the tools to do the job, <br />the Council must decide the political consequences <br />:roceeding. <br />icilmember Blanchard stated she had no statement to <br />on the issue. <br />;cilmember Linke pointed out that earlier in the year <br />Council authorized Attorney Meyers to go ahead at any <br />he feels the lawsuit should be implemented, and that <br />>rney Meyers has stated he would like to have the <br />;ultant in hand and preliminary work done before <br />irning to court. He stated he has not had an opportun- <br />to review the consultant proposal. <br />icilmember Hankner stated she also was not given any- <br />;g to review from the consultant who has expressed <br />;rest in working for the City. She also pointed out <br />: according to the agenda, the topic for this <br />ling was a discussion of. the Anoka County -Blaine <br />;ort improvements, not whether to proceed with legal <br />.on. <br />actor Thatcher reported bids had been opened earlier <br />.he day for the servicing of Well No. 2, and re- <br />ied the bids received and recommended it be awarded <br />:he low bidder, B. H. Renner & Sons, Inc., in the <br />;nt of $11,342. He advised he has done business <br />; them before and feels they are a reputable firm. <br />.on/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve the award <br />H. Renner and Sons, Inc., in the amount of <br />342 for Well No. 2 maintenance. <br />,es 0 nays <br />actor Thatcher reported that new developments <br />come up regarding the storm water drainage <br />abilities. The major issue at the Planning <br />;ission meeting was the size of the storm <br />:r retention basin, and that in speaking with <br />; Johnson today, the size required was deter- <br />:d to be 7/10ths of an acre, and the developer <br />roposing a 3.3 acre retention basin, which is <br />times the required size. He pointed out this <br />d go a long way toward solving the problems of <br />m water drainage in that area of the City. <br />8. Consideration <br />of Bids for the <br />Servicing of <br />Well No. 2 <br />Motion Carried <br />9. Consideration <br />of Staff Memo <br />Regarding <br />Christopher <br />Companies <br />Development Prr <br />M <br />