My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/02/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/1984
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-3- <br />B. Disadvantages (coat.) <br />2. Limited Range. Because of the lack of propane service <br />stations in parts of the state and country, straight <br />propane vehicles call have a limited range. <br />3. Acceleration Loss. Dual fuel powered vehicles have a <br />slight reduction in acceleration and top -end vehicle <br />speed as compared to gasoline because the engine cannot <br />be properly tuned to run on both propane and gasoline. <br />A. Finicky Performance. Propane powered engines tend to <br />be more finicky than gasoline, thus, requiring greater <br />attention to maintenance. <br />5. Additional Weight. On a straight propane system an addi- <br />tional 150 lbs. is added to the vehicle weight which can <br />be an important factor on some vehicles. <br />Once all of the advantages and disadvantages are weighed, the <br />financial aspects of propane conversion needs to be considered. <br />The cost of conversion varies depending upon vehicle type and <br />engine size and if the conversion is contracted out or done <br />in-house. Basically, it can be said that a conversion costs between <br />$1,000 and $1,500. In determining the financial feasibility of <br />conversion one needs to compare the cost of gasoline consumption <br />versus propane consumption and the paybac)c period for a conversion. <br />The average payback period for a private auto being driven 10,000 <br />miles per year is 11 years (Appendix A), whereas, a fleet of five <br />vehicles, each being driven 30,000 miles per year, has a payback of <br />two years (Appendix B). In each case consideration was not given <br />to reduced maintenance costs. Appendix C .is a chart provided by <br />the National LP Gas Association showing the possible savings in <br />using propane. <br />The final factor to be considered when deciding to convert to propane <br />is whether to use a straight propane or dual fuel system. The <br />advantages and disadvantages for each, in addition to the advantages <br />and disadvantages of propane as already listed, are: <br />A. Straight Propane System <br />1. Advantages - <br />a. No Fuel Pump. When using a straight propane system <br />the fuel pump can be eliminated. <br />b. Reduced Carburetor Maintenance. A straight propane <br />carburetor is a simpler mechanism requiring minimal <br />maintenance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.