My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/03/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/03/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:58:05 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/26/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t&_ / <br />MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Clerk -Administrator <br />DATE: March 28, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: CONTROVERSIAL REZONINGS <br />At the March 19th Council Meeting you directed staff to prepare <br />recommended schedule for the public hearings for the 17 parcels <br />of property which have been proposed to be rezoned under the <br />comprehensive rezoning process and have been identified as being <br />of a controversial nature. City Attorney Meyers and I met and <br />discussed the scheduling of the hearings and would recommend the <br />following: <br />May 14 - Church Triangle <br />2740 Highway 10 <br />2 lots north of 7190 Silver Lake Road <br />South corner of Old Highway 8 and County Road H <br />May 28 - Harstad Property, Silver Lake Road <br />Mid -American Auto <br />K Gas Station <br />Steve's Appliances <br />June 11 - Import Auto <br />7860 Groveland Road <br />Simon's Liquor <br />PAC Company <br />2806/08 Highway 10 <br />Northeast Marine <br />June 25 - 7801 Silver Lake Road <br />7373 Knollwood Drive <br />2752 County Road H-2 <br />Each of these items would have a separate hearing per the recommenda- <br />tion of the City Attorney, with the hearings being scheduled 15 <br />minutes apart for purposes of. notification. Thus, the hearings would <br />be held at 7:45, 8:00, and so on. <br />In discussing the procedures for conducting the hearings for these <br />controversial rezonings Attorney Meyers suggested that there is a <br />need for an advocate to be present at these hearings to speak on <br />behalf of the rezonings and the reasons for why these rezonings are <br />being proposed by the Planning Commission. I have had preliminary <br />conversations with Planning Commission Chairperson Peg Mountin and <br />she has indicated that she will be present at your April 2nd Agenda <br />Session to discuss the need for an advocate to be present at these <br />hearings and what individual or individuals would be most appropriate <br />to serve that purpose. The reason Attorney Meyers is recommending <br />the need for an advocate is that these rezonings are being recommended <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.