My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/04/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/04/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:22:35 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/23/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />April 9, 1984 <br />Page Eight <br />Regular Meeting <br />----------------------- ---------------------------- ---------- <br />r <br />refused to turn the volume down, with their many <br />booking <br />frequests. <br />She explained the bands they are <br />is <br />\✓ <br />now are country, which softer. <br />Mayor McCarty pointed out the building is air con- <br />ditioned, so the noise problem should not increase <br />He that the refuse <br />during the summer months. added <br />outside will be a concern, which the Public Works <br />department will keep an eye on. <br />Mayor McCarty stated no formal motion was required <br />of the public hearing <br />from the Council, as the purpose <br />Mr. Povlitzki and the residents together, <br />was to get <br />which had been accomplished. He added Mr. Povlitzki <br />had don a very good job at the former Launching Pad, <br />and he hopes the City will have a good relationship <br />with him in the future. He added that the public <br />hearing will become part of his record. <br />Councilmember Hankner reminded the residents that if <br />file it with the <br />they have a complaint, they should <br />record. <br />City, so it becomes a matter of <br />Mr. Povlitzki questioned why he had been pressured <br />by the Mayor and the City. He and Mayor McCarty got <br />into a heated discussion on the requirements of a <br />•�, <br />�A <br />restaurant license and Mr. Povlitzki's compliance or <br />food, and whether a <br />non-compliance with serving <br />weiner wheel constituted food service, and whether <br />Staff had told Mr. Povlitzki it was alright to con- <br />sider the weiner wheel a food operation while the <br />kitchen was under construction. <br />Mr. Berg stated they were under the opinion that a <br />weiner wheel was sufficient as it was on a temporary <br />basis, and Mr. Povlitzki began working on the kitchen <br />from the very beginning. He added it is in full <br />oeration now, open Mrs. Povlitzki wouldf be glad toor 11 sshow atand Mr. or <br />heCo Council <br />through the kitchen. <br />Councilmember Hankner reminded the Council they were <br />informed all along about what was happening and what <br />type plansowere�forehisce there kitchen.waSheand alsohat Mr. st stated that he <br />was within the State statutes, and he has been a good <br />businessman and is willing to work with the residents. <br />Mr. Michna asked that it be noted on the record that <br />Mr. Povlitzki has agreed to replace the fence that was <br />F, knocked down during the Anchor Inn operation. <br />Mayor McCarty asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to <br />"✓✓ advise e <br />ld Mr. <br />Povlitzki itowas iwhich Staff <br />alrightto usetheeweinerowheel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.